From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Michal Piotrowski <michal.k.k.piotrowski@gmail.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [bug] SLUB & freeing locks [was: Re: 2.6.23-rc1: known regressions with patches]
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 20:04:37 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1185473077.15205.7.camel@lappy> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1185441963.8197.67.camel@twins>
On Thu, 2007-07-26 at 11:26 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> ---
> mm/slub.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> Index: linux-2.6/mm/slub.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/mm/slub.c
> +++ linux-2.6/mm/slub.c
> @@ -1131,6 +1131,7 @@ static void __free_slab(struct kmem_cach
> slab_pad_check(s, page);
> for_each_object(p, s, page_address(page))
> check_object(s, page, p, 0);
> + ClearSlabDebug(page);
> }
>
> mod_zone_page_state(page_zone(page),
> @@ -1169,7 +1170,6 @@ static void discard_slab(struct kmem_cac
>
> atomic_long_dec(&n->nr_slabs);
> reset_page_mapcount(page);
> - ClearSlabDebug(page);
> __ClearPageSlab(page);
> free_slab(s, page);
> }
>
Christoph, how about this bit, it looks to me like we clear SlabDebug()
before we hit the last check in __free_slab().
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-07-26 18:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-07-23 9:47 2.6.23-rc1: known regressions with patches Michal Piotrowski
2007-07-23 10:25 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-23 22:59 ` Greg KH
2007-07-24 21:57 ` Michal Piotrowski
2007-07-24 6:21 ` Tejun Heo
2007-07-26 9:10 ` [bug] SLUB & freeing locks [was: Re: 2.6.23-rc1: known regressions with patches] Ingo Molnar
2007-07-26 9:26 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-07-26 9:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-07-26 10:50 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-26 17:47 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-07-26 11:08 ` Pekka Enberg
2007-07-26 11:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-07-26 17:51 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-07-26 18:01 ` [PATCH] slub: add lock debugging check Peter Zijlstra
2007-07-26 17:47 ` [bug] SLUB & freeing locks [was: Re: 2.6.23-rc1: known regressions with patches] Christoph Lameter
2007-07-26 18:04 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2007-07-26 18:10 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-07-26 18:17 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-07-26 18:54 ` [PATCH] slub: fix bug in slub debug support Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1185473077.15205.7.camel@lappy \
--to=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=clameter@sgi.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michal.k.k.piotrowski@gmail.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.