From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965569AbXG2XAa (ORCPT ); Sun, 29 Jul 2007 19:00:30 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S965668AbXG2W7y (ORCPT ); Sun, 29 Jul 2007 18:59:54 -0400 Received: from outmail1.freedom2surf.net ([194.106.33.237]:38423 "EHLO outmail1.freedom2surf.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965531AbXG2W7t (ORCPT ); Sun, 29 Jul 2007 18:59:49 -0400 Subject: Re: RFC: Remove the arm26 port From: ian To: Adrian Bunk Cc: john@dnsworld.co.uk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rmk@arm.linux.org.uk In-Reply-To: <20070729115040.GD30976@stusta.de> References: <20070707201208.GJ3492@stusta.de> <20070729115040.GD30976@stusta.de> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2007 23:58:46 +0100 Message-Id: <1185749926.2305.16.camel@wirenth> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.10.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 2007-07-29 at 13:50 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > Considering the state of the arm26 port, I do hereby suggest to remove > it from the Linx kernel since it's far from a usable state and doesn't > seem to come back into a usable state. > > If anyone wants to work on getting this port back into a usable state in > the forseeable future he should speak up now. Hi guys. Obviously I havent had time to work on the port in some time now - I am ok with it being dropped - the work of splitting it out wont be lost and until its fixed up, its just in other peoples way. If I get time to work on it in future, I'll let you all know. -Ian