From: Dave Wysochanski <dwysocha@redhat.com>
To: dm-devel <dm-devel@redhat.com>
Subject: [RFC] Naming of dm-multipath hardware handler modules
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 16:16:52 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1185913012.4392.46.camel@linux-cxyg> (raw)
Do we have an agreed upon scheme?
I noticed in 2.6.23-rc1, the RDAC module is named "dm-mpath-rdac.ko",
but the source file is "dm-rdac.c". Should we be naming things
"dm-mpath-hwhname" everywhere? If so, should we rename dm-emc?
I was not sure exactly what was correct for the HP handler. Currently
it follows the dm-emc scheme, which is probably wrong.
next reply other threads:[~2007-07-31 20:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-07-31 20:16 Dave Wysochanski [this message]
2007-08-01 16:39 ` [RFC] Naming of dm-multipath hardware handler modules Mike Christie
2007-08-01 16:42 ` Mike Christie
2007-08-01 17:06 ` Mike Christie
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1185913012.4392.46.camel@linux-cxyg \
--to=dwysocha@redhat.com \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.