From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Gleixner Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fixes spurious system load spikes in /proc/loadavgrt Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 23:37:12 +0200 Message-ID: <1187386632.7007.100.camel@chaos> References: <20070817003751.GN3954@unix.sh> <1187323117.23789.55.camel@imap.mvista.com> <1187339967.7007.71.camel@chaos> <1187367845.23789.62.camel@imap.mvista.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "Luis Claudio R. Goncalves" , Ingo Molnar , linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org To: Daniel Walker Return-path: Received: from www.osadl.org ([213.239.205.134]:40449 "EHLO mail.tglx.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752742AbXHQVhW (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Aug 2007 17:37:22 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1187367845.23789.62.camel@imap.mvista.com> Sender: linux-rt-users-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-rt-users.vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2007-08-17 at 09:24 -0700, Daniel Walker wrote: > > > It would be nice if you explained better what the code defect was, and > > > how you fixed it .. One could extract that from the code, but it's nice > > > if it's backed up with a text description.. Also you should CC lkml next > > > time. > > > > It would be nice if you'd stop being uber schoolmasterly. Luis > > explanation of the defect is entirely clear and the resulting fix is > > obvious. .. You could really look at the patch and figure out your self, > > that it needs no text description at all. Also you should comment on the > > nice patch itself next time. > > If all you've said was true I wouldn't have commented on it. There was > no text description of the code defect, and yes as I said I can get it > from the code but it's _nice_ when it's backed up with a text > description .. You really start to annoy me. There was a detailed bug description and the code defect is easy to see. If you neither have the interest nor the time to look at the actual _trivial_ _self explaining_ patch, then please look for some other playground to live out your wisenheimer airs and graces. > If your just going to start flames Thomas take it off list. Flames are only flames when they happen in public. tglx