All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
diff for duplicates of <11877422e38eade300dd1cdb9e423d47@localhost>

diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt
index 617f234..bbf788e 100644
--- a/a/1.txt
+++ b/N1/1.txt
@@ -1,26 +1,14 @@
 
-On Wed, 07 Dec 2011 11:15:38 +0100, Hagen Paul Pfeifer <hagen@jauu.net>
-
+On Wed, 07 Dec 2011 11:15:38 +0100, Hagen Paul Pfeifer <hagen-GvnIQ6b/HdU@public.gmane.org>
 wrote:
-
  
-
 > Question two: I submitted pfast_head_drop to drop more outdated data
-
 > instead of new data. Back in time I thought TCP _may_ experience
-
 benefits
-
 > because more up-to-date SACK data packets are saved. Are there any other
-
 > TCP advantages with head drop policy?
 
-
-
 Small comment: pfast_head_drop was intended for UDP. E.g. OLSR messages,
-
 regular GPS reporting and the like. TCP was not the focus at that time.
 
-
-
 HGN
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest
index 7e599f5..64c251d 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N1/content_digest
@@ -1,42 +1,29 @@
  "ref\0CAA93jw7kQYONQiAozatRmdRRJeK0GB9eNDWtRZ3AL+OVKn0OpA@mail.gmail.com\0"
  "ref\01323082774.2670.40.camel@edumazet-HP-Compaq-6005-Pro-SFF-PC\0"
  "ref\09dfc3c5eb811f2774b378fce0158b3e7@localhost\0"
- "From\0Hagen Paul Pfeifer <hagen@jauu.net>\0"
- "Subject\0Re: [Bloat] Time in Queue, bufferbloat, and... our accidentally  interplanetary network\0"
+ "From\0Hagen Paul Pfeifer <hagen-GvnIQ6b/HdU@public.gmane.org>\0"
+ "Subject\0Re: Time in Queue, bufferbloat, and... our accidentally  interplanetary network\0"
  "Date\0Wed, 07 Dec 2011 11:19:29 +0100\0"
- "To\0Hagen Paul Pfeifer <hagen@jauu.net>\0"
- "Cc\0Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>"
-  bloat-devel <bloat-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
-  <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
-  linux-wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
- " bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>\0"
+ "To\0Hagen Paul Pfeifer <hagen-GvnIQ6b/HdU@public.gmane.org>\0"
+ "Cc\0linux-wireless <linux-wireless-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>"
+  netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
+  bloat-devel <bloat-devel-JXvr2/1DY2fm6VMwtOF2vx4hnT+Y9+D1@public.gmane.org>
+ " bloat <bloat-JXvr2/1DY2fm6VMwtOF2vx4hnT+Y9+D1@public.gmane.org>\0"
  "\00:1\0"
  "b\0"
  "\n"
- "On Wed, 07 Dec 2011 11:15:38 +0100, Hagen Paul Pfeifer <hagen@jauu.net>\n"
- "\n"
+ "On Wed, 07 Dec 2011 11:15:38 +0100, Hagen Paul Pfeifer <hagen-GvnIQ6b/HdU@public.gmane.org>\n"
  "wrote:\n"
- "\n"
  " \n"
- "\n"
  "> Question two: I submitted pfast_head_drop to drop more outdated data\n"
- "\n"
  "> instead of new data. Back in time I thought TCP _may_ experience\n"
- "\n"
  "benefits\n"
- "\n"
  "> because more up-to-date SACK data packets are saved. Are there any other\n"
- "\n"
  "> TCP advantages with head drop policy?\n"
  "\n"
- "\n"
- "\n"
  "Small comment: pfast_head_drop was intended for UDP. E.g. OLSR messages,\n"
- "\n"
  "regular GPS reporting and the like. TCP was not the focus at that time.\n"
  "\n"
- "\n"
- "\n"
  HGN
 
-29a120403eecdf47bc4c88b1d7d7090c97ed65f6d1da7e4c5d502a4afa587043
+6a3f8df51587118064ecfd427190e255b33ca063b6b9f31f94ed1818bbf35696

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.