Re: [PATCH net-2.6.24] introduce MAC_FMT/MAC_ARG

[Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>]

On Mon, 2007-08-27 at 13:41 -0700, David Miller wrote:
> there are better approaches to this,
> how about just calling:
> 
> 	print_mac(dev->dev_addr);
> 
> Sure, we'll have to split up printk() calls, but in the end it's
> likely still smaller and better.  And I think it's much cleaner
> than this macro stuff.

My original patch had the equivalent of

	char* print_mac(char* buf, const char* addr) {
		sprintf(buf,"%02x:...", addr[0]...)
		return buf;
	}

and used:

	DECLARE_MAC_BUF(var); //same as char var[18];
	printk(MAC_FMT, MAC_ARG(var, addr));

which didn't require splitting printk()s

I've still got the original patch.
It's just substituting EUI48 for MAC and forward porting.

Want something like that?