All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "James C. Georgas" <jgeorgas@georgas.ca>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: broken ACPI NUMA config option
Date: Sat, 08 Sep 2007 19:33:15 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1189294395.13467.39.camel@Tachyon.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1189291899.13467.20.camel@Tachyon.home>

On Sat, 2007-08-09 at 18:51 -0400, James C. Georgas wrote:
> If I select X86_64_ACPI_NUMA, then ACPI_NUMA is (properly) selected
> automatically, but ACPI is not selected automatically. This causes
> ACPI_NUMA to not be built, and the kernel compile fails with unresolved
> symbols.
> 

Uh, it seems that I'm getting different results this time. Now,
X86_64_ACPI_NUMA does select ACPI, but PM (parent of ACPI) is not
automatically selected. Same result for the compile, though. Boom.

I seem to get different behaviour in general on subsequent runs of make
menuconfig.

For example, the last time I ran it, I was able to select K8_NUMA and
X86_64_ACPI_NUMA, independently of one another.

This time, though, the visibility of K8_NUMA is dependent on whether or
not X86_64_ACPI_NUMA is selected.

Should K8_NUMA and X86_64_ACPI_NUMA both be under NUMA, and independent
of one another?

James
	/\V


  parent reply	other threads:[~2007-09-08 23:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-09-08 22:51 broken ACPI NUMA config option James C. Georgas
2007-09-08 22:54 ` James C. Georgas
2007-09-08 23:33 ` James C. Georgas [this message]
2007-09-09  1:09 ` Randy Dunlap
2007-09-09  1:16   ` Randy Dunlap
2007-09-09  3:48     ` James C. Georgas
2007-09-09  4:24       ` Yinghai Lu
2007-09-09  5:00       ` Randy Dunlap
2007-09-09 13:41         ` James C. Georgas
2007-09-09 17:32           ` Randy Dunlap
2007-09-09  1:22   ` James C. Georgas
2007-09-09  9:07     ` Andi Kleen
2007-09-09 13:19       ` [PATCH] KCONFIG: fix pseudo dependency between K8_NUMA and X86_64_ACPI_NUMA config options James C. Georgas
2007-09-09 13:46         ` Andi Kleen
2007-09-09 18:43           ` James C. Georgas
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-09-09  2:36 broken ACPI NUMA config option James C. Georgas
2007-09-09  7:06 ` Sam Ravnborg

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1189294395.13467.39.camel@Tachyon.home \
    --to=jgeorgas@georgas.ca \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.