From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from jazzdrum.ncsc.mil (zombie.ncsc.mil [144.51.88.131]) by tarius.tycho.ncsc.mil (8.13.1/8.13.1) with SMTP id l8BLlevt031209 for ; Tue, 11 Sep 2007 17:47:40 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com (jazzdrum.ncsc.mil [144.51.5.7]) by jazzdrum.ncsc.mil (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id l8BLlcbi017814 for ; Tue, 11 Sep 2007 21:47:39 GMT Subject: Re: concept of a permissive domain From: Eric Paris To: Karl MacMillan Cc: Daniel J Walsh , selinux@tycho.nsa.gov In-Reply-To: <1189545987.4823.6.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <1189537981.3407.51.camel@localhost.localdomain> <46E6FB25.5070507@redhat.com> <1189545987.4823.6.camel@localhost.localdomain> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 17:47:36 -0400 Message-Id: <1189547256.3407.57.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: owner-selinux@tycho.nsa.gov List-Id: selinux@tycho.nsa.gov On Tue, 2007-09-11 at 17:26 -0400, Karl MacMillan wrote: > On Tue, 2007-09-11 at 16:31 -0400, Daniel J Walsh wrote: > [...] > > One other feature/requirement would be to not override dontaudit rules. > > So if I have a domain in permissive mode and I have a dontaudit rule on > > reading /etc/shadow. The app should still be denied reading > > /etc/shadow. (This is not a show stopper, but would allow us to force > > apps to take the code paths they will take in enforcing mode.) > > This isn't specific to per-domain permissive, right? It would be useful > in general for permissive. You know, I'm quite happy that setenforce=0 ALWAYS means 'not selinux fault' not sure I'm comfortable with changing that, although I have no problem with dan's suggestion.... -- This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list. If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@tycho.nsa.gov with the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.