From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from jazzhorn.ncsc.mil (mummy.ncsc.mil [144.51.88.129]) by tarius.tycho.ncsc.mil (8.13.1/8.13.1) with SMTP id l8CDZxjs024483 for ; Wed, 12 Sep 2007 09:35:59 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com (jazzhorn.ncsc.mil [144.51.5.9]) by jazzhorn.ncsc.mil (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id l8CDZw0x010379 for ; Wed, 12 Sep 2007 13:35:59 GMT Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l8CDRUVH021897 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 12 Sep 2007 09:27:30 -0400 Subject: Re: concept of a permissive domain From: Karl MacMillan To: Eric Paris Cc: Daniel J Walsh , selinux@tycho.nsa.gov In-Reply-To: <1189547256.3407.57.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <1189537981.3407.51.camel@localhost.localdomain> <46E6FB25.5070507@redhat.com> <1189545987.4823.6.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1189547256.3407.57.camel@localhost.localdomain> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 09:27:22 -0400 Message-Id: <1189603642.3555.7.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: owner-selinux@tycho.nsa.gov List-Id: selinux@tycho.nsa.gov On Tue, 2007-09-11 at 17:47 -0400, Eric Paris wrote: > On Tue, 2007-09-11 at 17:26 -0400, Karl MacMillan wrote: > > On Tue, 2007-09-11 at 16:31 -0400, Daniel J Walsh wrote: > > [...] > > > One other feature/requirement would be to not override dontaudit rules. > > > So if I have a domain in permissive mode and I have a dontaudit rule on > > > reading /etc/shadow. The app should still be denied reading > > > /etc/shadow. (This is not a show stopper, but would allow us to force > > > apps to take the code paths they will take in enforcing mode.) > > > > This isn't specific to per-domain permissive, right? It would be useful > > in general for permissive. > > You know, I'm quite happy that setenforce=0 ALWAYS means 'not selinux > fault' not sure I'm comfortable with changing that, although I have no > problem with dan's suggestion.... > Well, there are very rare circumstances where permissive can still cause problems, but your general point is well taken. Karl -- This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list. If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@tycho.nsa.gov with the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.