All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>,
	Chandramouli Narayanan <mouli@linux.intel.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC -mm 0/2] i386/x86_64 boot: 32-bit boot protocol
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 16:47:35 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1190018855.5866.27.camel@caritas-dev.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200709171040.27043.ak@suse.de>

On Mon, 2007-09-17 at 10:40 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Monday 17 September 2007 10:26:12 Huang, Ying wrote:
> > For machine with some new BIOS other than legacy BIOS, such as EFI,
> > LinuxBIOS, etc, and kexec, the 16-bit real mode setup code in kernel
> > based on legacy BIOS can not be used, so a 32-bit boot protocol need
> > to be defined.
> 
> The patch doesn't seem to be what you advertise in the description.
> Can you start with a patch that just implements the new boot protocol
> parsing for better review? The EFI code should be all in separate 
> patches.
> -Andi

The real contents of 32-bit boot protocol patch is is in another 2 mails
with the title:

[RFC -mm 1/2] i386/x86_64 boot: setup data
[RFC -mm 2/2] i386/x86_64 boot: document for 32 bit boot protocol

The EFI patch in this mail is just an example of 32-bit boot protocol
usage.

Best Regards,
Huang Ying

  reply	other threads:[~2007-09-17  9:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-09-17  8:26 [RFC -mm 0/2] i386/x86_64 boot: 32-bit boot protocol Huang, Ying
2007-09-17  8:40 ` Andi Kleen
2007-09-17  8:47   ` Huang, Ying [this message]
2007-09-17 14:30     ` Andi Kleen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1190018855.5866.27.camel@caritas-dev.intel.com \
    --to=ying.huang@intel.com \
    --cc=ak@suse.de \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mouli@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=yhlu.kernel@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.