From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dave Hansen Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] Account for the slub objects Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 09:08:21 -0700 Message-ID: <1190045301.26982.56.camel@localhost> References: <46EE70B4.6060902@openvz.org> <46EE74AF.70105@openvz.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <46EE74AF.70105-GEFAQzZX7r8dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org Errors-To: containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org To: Pavel Emelyanov Cc: Linux Containers , Christoph Lameter List-Id: containers.vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2007-09-17 at 16:35 +0400, Pavel Emelyanov wrote: > The struct page gets an extra pointer (just like it has with > the RSS controller) and this pointer points to the array of > the kmem_container pointers - one for each object stored on > that page itself. Can't these at least be unioned so we don't make it any _worse_ when both are turned on? -- Dave