From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Gleixner Subject: Re: [PATCH] Don't sleep in oops_begin() Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 10:30:51 +0200 Message-ID: <1190104251.2995.66.camel@chaos> References: <200709172012.21102.ak@suse.de> <200709172220.43871.ak@suse.de> <1190074235.3253.135.camel@imap.mvista.com> <200709181005.49542.ak@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Daniel Walker , Sven-Thorsten Dietrich , mingo@elte.hu, linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org To: Andi Kleen Return-path: Received: from www.osadl.org ([213.239.205.134]:34715 "EHLO mail.tglx.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751232AbXIRIay (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Sep 2007 04:30:54 -0400 In-Reply-To: <200709181005.49542.ak@suse.de> Sender: linux-rt-users-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-rt-users.vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2007-09-18 at 10:05 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote: > > > I disagree for the oops case. You want the simplest possible code > > > here. > > > > If that's true for real time , should be true for mainline right? > > You mean it shouldn't use lockdep etc. there? Yes good point. I can change > that Yes, the oops code path should be as decoupled as possible. We want to know what happened in the first place and not what consequential damage is caused by the initial problem. tglx