Re: 44x bug: funny TLB writes?

[Hollis Blanchard <hollisb@us.ibm.com>]

On Fri, 2007-09-21 at 15:42 +1000, David Gibson wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 20, 2007 at 10:34:12PM -0500, Hollis Blanchard wrote:
> > I seem to have come across a strange bug while doing KVM development. It
> > seems that the final tlbwe in finish_tlb (head_44x.S) is actually
> > leaking RPN bits into the "attribute" word.
> > 
> > When I set a breakpoint there and press enter on the serial console, I
> > see r12=ef600703, which is the physical address of the UART on this chip
> > (440EP), plus the correct permission bits at the bottom.
> > 
> > Am I crazy? I'm not really looking to step through that assembly right
> > now... Clearly (current) hardware is just ignoring these errant writes,
> > but it should be fixed.
> 
> A quick glance at the code suggests this is indeed wrong.  Hurrah.
> Another reason to rewrite the 44x tlb miss handling.

Just a quick fix would be fine too... ;)

I'm just glad it's not a KVM bug, because when I dumped the TLB state
and saw bizarre values I was getting really worried.

> PS.  "errant" and "error" are not cognate, even if the chip doc
> writers think so...

According to Merriam Webster, errant 2c is "c : behaving wrongly <an
errant child>", so I'm OK with it.

-- 
Hollis Blanchard
IBM Linux Technology Center