From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: =?utf-8?Q?Maciej_So=C5=82tysiak?= <pysiak.satriani@wp.pl>
Subject: Re: reiser4 can now bear with filled fs, looks stable to me...
Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 23:28:49 +0200
Message-ID: <11910177823.20060731232849@wp.pl>
References: <20060730223755.GA14386@hermes.uziel.local> <44CD4127.9010202@slaphack.com>
Reply-To: =?utf-8?Q?Maciej_So=C5=82tysiak?= <pysiak.satriani@wp.pl>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <reiserfs-list-return-29336-reiserfs=m.gmane.org@namesys.com>
list-help: <mailto:reiserfs-list-help@namesys.com>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:reiserfs-list-unsubscribe@namesys.com>
list-post: <mailto:reiserfs-list@namesys.com>
Errors-To: flx@namesys.com
In-Reply-To: <44CD4127.9010202@slaphack.com>
List-Id: <reiserfs-devel.vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
To: reiserfs-list@namesys.com, reiserfs-list@namesys.com

Hello David,

Monday, July 31, 2006, 1:30:47 AM, you wrote:
> Amen.  I do not want to see Reiser4 not succeed because of politics, and
> it really looks like the only way to win the political war is not to 
> play.  The technical stuff is really the last way in, but neither side
> has said anything technical in awhile.  The most technical things that
> have happened lately is Hans pointing to benchmarks and LKML pointing to
> ext3 "plugins".
So let's do the math (cost-wise, time-wise)
- it is cheaper to develop:
  a) quality patches
  b) distro rpms
  c) repositories with patched sources and binary kernels for debian/ubuntu
  d) other
- it is more expensive to:
  a) succeed at kernel inclusion
  b) argue
  c) waste time


-- 
Best regards,
Maciej