From: Tom Tucker <tom@opengridcomputing.com>
To: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Cc: neilb@suse.de, bfields@fieldses.org, nfs@lists.sourceforge.net,
gnb@sgi.com
Subject: Re: [RFC, PATCH 12/35] svc: Add a generic transport svc_create_xprt function
Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2007 15:01:09 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1191441669.1918.8.camel@trinity.ogc.int> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <383DDDA6-29E5-41CF-A2F7-9C45BB26CE64@oracle.com>
On Tue, 2007-10-02 at 11:39 -0400, Chuck Lever wrote:
> On Oct 1, 2007, at 3:27 PM, Tom Tucker wrote:
> >
[...snip...]
> >
> > struct svc_xprt_ops {
> > + struct svc_xprt *(*xpo_create)(struct svc_serv *,
> > + struct sockaddr *,
> > + int);
>
> Should xpo_create also have a length argument, as in (struct sockaddr
> *, socklen_t) ?
I think socklen_t is only defined in userland.
>
> (or whatever the type of sockaddr lengths are: size_t perhaps?)
>
I've seen it both ways. I just copied kernel_bind which takes an int for
the length. Does anyone know what the preferred type is for sockaddr
len?
> > struct svc_xprt *(*xpo_accept)(struct svc_xprt *);
> > int (*xpo_has_wspace)(struct svc_xprt *);
> > int (*xpo_recvfrom)(struct svc_rqst *);
> > @@ -37,5 +40,6 @@ struct svc_xprt {
> > int svc_reg_xprt_class(struct svc_xprt_class *);
> > int svc_unreg_xprt_class(struct svc_xprt_class *);
> > void svc_xprt_init(struct svc_xprt_class *, struct svc_xprt *);
> > +int svc_create_xprt(struct svc_serv *, char *, unsigned short, int);
> >
> > #endif /* SUNRPC_SVC_XPRT_H */
> > diff --git a/net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c b/net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c
> > index 8ea65c3..d57064f 100644
> > --- a/net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c
> > +++ b/net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c
> > @@ -93,3 +93,38 @@ void svc_xprt_init(struct svc_xprt_class
> > xpt->xpt_max_payload = xcl->xcl_max_payload;
> > }
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(svc_xprt_init);
> > +
> > +int svc_create_xprt(struct svc_serv *serv, char *xprt_name,
> > unsigned short port,
> > + int flags)
> > +{
> > + struct svc_xprt_class *xcl;
> > + int ret = -ENOENT;
> > + struct sockaddr_in sin = {
> > + .sin_family = AF_INET,
> > + .sin_addr.s_addr = INADDR_ANY,
> > + .sin_port = htons(port),
> > + };
> > + dprintk("svc: creating transport %s[%d]\n", xprt_name, port);
> > + spin_lock(&svc_xprt_class_lock);
> > + list_for_each_entry(xcl, &svc_xprt_class_list, xcl_list) {
> > + if (strcmp(xprt_name, xcl->xcl_name) == 0) {
> > + spin_unlock(&svc_xprt_class_lock);
> > + if (try_module_get(xcl->xcl_owner)) {
> > + struct svc_xprt *newxprt;
> > + ret = 0;
> > + newxprt = xcl->xcl_ops->xpo_create
> > + (serv, (struct sockaddr *)&sin, flags);
> > + if (IS_ERR(newxprt)) {
> > + module_put(xcl->xcl_owner);
> > + ret = PTR_ERR(newxprt);
> > + }
> > + }
> > + goto out;
> > + }
> > + }
> > + spin_unlock(&svc_xprt_class_lock);
> > + dprintk("svc: transport %s not found\n", xprt_name);
> > + out:
> > + return ret;
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(svc_create_xprt);
> > diff --git a/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c b/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c
> > index ffc54a1..e3c74e0 100644
> > --- a/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c
> > +++ b/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c
> > @@ -90,6 +90,8 @@ static void svc_sock_free(struct svc_xp
> > static struct svc_deferred_req *svc_deferred_dequeue(struct
> > svc_sock *svsk);
> > static int svc_deferred_recv(struct svc_rqst *rqstp);
> > static struct cache_deferred_req *svc_defer(struct cache_req *req);
> > +static struct svc_xprt *
> > +svc_create_socket(struct svc_serv *, int, struct sockaddr *, int,
> > int);
> >
> > /* apparently the "standard" is that clients close
> > * idle connections after 5 minutes, servers after
> > @@ -381,6 +383,7 @@ svc_sock_put(struct svc_sock *svsk)
> > {
> > if (atomic_dec_and_test(&svsk->sk_inuse)) {
> > BUG_ON(!test_bit(SK_DEAD, &svsk->sk_flags));
> > + module_put(svsk->sk_xprt.xpt_class->xcl_owner);
> > svsk->sk_xprt.xpt_ops.xpo_free(&svsk->sk_xprt);
> > }
> > }
> > @@ -921,7 +924,15 @@ svc_udp_accept(struct svc_xprt *xprt)
> > return NULL;
> > }
> >
> > +static struct svc_xprt *
> > +svc_udp_create(struct svc_serv *serv, struct sockaddr *sa, int flags)
> > +{
> > + return svc_create_socket(serv, IPPROTO_UDP, sa,
> > + sizeof(struct sockaddr_in), flags);
> > +}
> > +
> > static struct svc_xprt_ops svc_udp_ops = {
> > + .xpo_create = svc_udp_create,
> > .xpo_recvfrom = svc_udp_recvfrom,
> > .xpo_sendto = svc_udp_sendto,
> > .xpo_release = svc_release_skb,
> > @@ -934,6 +945,7 @@ static struct svc_xprt_ops svc_udp_ops =
> >
> > static struct svc_xprt_class svc_udp_class = {
> > .xcl_name = "udp",
> > + .xcl_owner = THIS_MODULE,
> > .xcl_ops = &svc_udp_ops,
> > .xcl_max_payload = RPCSVC_MAXPAYLOAD_UDP,
> > };
> > @@ -1357,7 +1369,15 @@ svc_tcp_has_wspace(struct svc_xprt *xprt
> > return 1;
> > }
> >
> > +static struct svc_xprt *
> > +svc_tcp_create(struct svc_serv *serv, struct sockaddr *sa, int flags)
> > +{
> > + return svc_create_socket(serv, IPPROTO_TCP, sa,
> > + sizeof(struct sockaddr_in), flags);
> > +}
> > +
> > static struct svc_xprt_ops svc_tcp_ops = {
> > + .xpo_create = svc_tcp_create,
> > .xpo_recvfrom = svc_tcp_recvfrom,
> > .xpo_sendto = svc_tcp_sendto,
> > .xpo_release = svc_release_skb,
> > @@ -1370,6 +1390,7 @@ static struct svc_xprt_ops svc_tcp_ops =
> >
> > static struct svc_xprt_class svc_tcp_class = {
> > .xcl_name = "tcp",
> > + .xcl_owner = THIS_MODULE,
> > .xcl_ops = &svc_tcp_ops,
> > .xcl_max_payload = RPCSVC_MAXPAYLOAD_TCP,
> > };
> > @@ -1594,8 +1615,14 @@ svc_recv(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, long ti
> > } else if (test_bit(SK_LISTENER, &svsk->sk_flags)) {
> > struct svc_xprt *newxpt;
> > newxpt = svsk->sk_xprt.xpt_ops.xpo_accept(&svsk->sk_xprt);
> > - if (newxpt)
> > + if (newxpt) {
> > + /*
> > + * We know this module_get will succeed because the
> > + * listener holds a reference too
> > + */
> > + __module_get(newxpt->xpt_class->xcl_owner);
> > svc_check_conn_limits(svsk->sk_server);
> > + }
> > svc_sock_received(svsk);
> > } else {
> > dprintk("svc: server %p, pool %u, socket %p, inuse=%d\n",
> > @@ -1835,8 +1862,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(svc_addsock);
> > /*
> > * Create socket for RPC service.
> > */
> > -static int svc_create_socket(struct svc_serv *serv, int protocol,
> > - struct sockaddr *sin, int len, int flags)
> > +static struct svc_xprt *
> > +svc_create_socket(struct svc_serv *serv, int protocol,
> > + struct sockaddr *sin, int len, int flags)
> > {
> > struct svc_sock *svsk;
> > struct socket *sock;
> > @@ -1851,13 +1879,13 @@ static int svc_create_socket(struct svc_
> > if (protocol != IPPROTO_UDP && protocol != IPPROTO_TCP) {
> > printk(KERN_WARNING "svc: only UDP and TCP "
> > "sockets supported\n");
> > - return -EINVAL;
> > + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> > }
> > type = (protocol == IPPROTO_UDP)? SOCK_DGRAM : SOCK_STREAM;
> >
> > error = sock_create_kern(sin->sa_family, type, protocol, &sock);
> > if (error < 0)
> > - return error;
> > + return ERR_PTR(error);
> >
> > svc_reclassify_socket(sock);
> >
> > @@ -1876,13 +1904,13 @@ static int svc_create_socket(struct svc_
> > if (protocol == IPPROTO_TCP)
> > set_bit(SK_LISTENER, &svsk->sk_flags);
> > svc_sock_received(svsk);
> > - return ntohs(inet_sk(svsk->sk_sk)->sport);
> > + return (struct svc_xprt *)svsk;
> > }
> >
> > bummer:
> > dprintk("svc: svc_create_socket error = %d\n", -error);
> > sock_release(sock);
> > - return error;
> > + return ERR_PTR(error);
> > }
> >
> > /*
> > @@ -1995,15 +2023,15 @@ void svc_force_close_socket(struct svc_s
> > int svc_makesock(struct svc_serv *serv, int protocol, unsigned
> > short port,
> > int flags)
> > {
> > - struct sockaddr_in sin = {
> > - .sin_family = AF_INET,
> > - .sin_addr.s_addr = INADDR_ANY,
> > - .sin_port = htons(port),
> > - };
> > -
> > dprintk("svc: creating socket proto = %d\n", protocol);
> > - return svc_create_socket(serv, protocol, (struct sockaddr *) &sin,
> > - sizeof(sin), flags);
> > + switch (protocol) {
> > + case IPPROTO_TCP:
> > + return svc_create_xprt(serv, "tcp", port, flags);
> > + case IPPROTO_UDP:
> > + return svc_create_xprt(serv, "udp", port, flags);
> > + default:
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + }
> > }
> >
> > /*
>
> Chuck Lever
> chuck.lever@oracle.com
>
>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________
NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-10-03 20:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 103+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-10-01 19:14 [RFC,PATCH 00/35] SVC Transport Switch Tom Tucker
2007-10-01 19:27 ` [RFC,PATCH 01/35] svc: Add an svc transport class Tom Tucker
2007-10-01 19:27 ` [RFC,PATCH 02/35] svc: Make svc_sock the tcp/udp transport Tom Tucker
2007-10-01 19:27 ` [RFC, PATCH 03/35] svc: Change the svc_sock in the rqstp structure to a transport Tom Tucker
2007-10-01 19:27 ` [RFC, PATCH 04/35] svc: Add a max payload value to the transport Tom Tucker
2007-10-02 14:54 ` Chuck Lever
2007-10-02 16:28 ` Tom Tucker
2007-10-03 11:09 ` Greg Banks
2007-10-03 14:26 ` Tom Tucker
2007-10-03 15:18 ` Chuck Lever
2007-10-04 1:10 ` Greg Banks
2007-10-01 19:27 ` [RFC, PATCH 05/35] svc: Move sk_sendto and sk_recvfrom to svc_xprt_class Tom Tucker
2007-10-02 15:04 ` Chuck Lever
2007-10-02 16:29 ` Tom Tucker
2007-10-02 16:57 ` Chuck Lever
2007-10-02 18:24 ` Tom Tucker
2007-10-02 18:30 ` Tom Tucker
2007-10-02 18:47 ` Chuck Lever
2007-10-02 19:55 ` Tom Tucker
2007-10-02 20:29 ` Chuck Lever
2007-10-02 20:35 ` Tom Tucker
2007-10-02 20:38 ` Tom Tucker
2007-10-04 1:34 ` Greg Banks
2007-10-04 1:21 ` Greg Banks
2007-10-03 11:13 ` Greg Banks
2007-10-01 19:27 ` [RFC, PATCH 06/35] svc: Add transport specific xpo_release function Tom Tucker
2007-10-02 15:18 ` Chuck Lever
2007-10-02 16:35 ` Tom Tucker
2007-10-04 1:48 ` Greg Banks
2007-10-01 19:27 ` [RFC,PATCH 07/35] svc: Add per-transport delete functions Tom Tucker
2007-10-01 19:27 ` [RFC,PATCH 08/35] svc: Add xpo_prep_reply_hdr Tom Tucker
2007-10-01 19:27 ` [RFC, PATCH 09/35] svc: Add a transport function that checks for write space Tom Tucker
2007-10-01 19:27 ` [RFC, PATCH 10/35] svc: Move close processing to a single place Tom Tucker
2007-10-01 19:27 ` [RFC,PATCH 11/35] svc: Add xpo_accept transport function Tom Tucker
2007-10-02 15:33 ` Chuck Lever
2007-10-02 16:41 ` Tom Tucker
2007-10-02 17:07 ` Chuck Lever
2007-10-02 18:28 ` Tom Tucker
2007-10-02 18:49 ` Chuck Lever
2007-10-04 1:54 ` Greg Banks
2007-10-01 19:27 ` [RFC, PATCH 12/35] svc: Add a generic transport svc_create_xprt function Tom Tucker
2007-10-02 15:39 ` Chuck Lever
2007-10-03 20:01 ` Tom Tucker [this message]
2007-10-03 20:04 ` Tom Tucker
2007-10-04 2:30 ` Greg Banks
2007-10-04 15:18 ` Chuck Lever
2007-10-01 19:27 ` [RFC, PATCH 13/35] svc: Change services to use new svc_create_xprt service Tom Tucker
2007-10-02 15:44 ` Chuck Lever
2007-10-02 16:45 ` Tom Tucker
2007-10-03 15:25 ` Chuck Lever
2007-10-03 16:23 ` Tom Tucker
2007-10-04 2:35 ` Greg Banks
2007-10-04 14:27 ` Tom Tucker
2007-10-09 17:09 ` J. Bruce Fields
2007-10-09 18:32 ` Tom Tucker
2007-10-09 19:49 ` J. Bruce Fields
2007-10-09 20:19 ` J. Bruce Fields
2007-10-01 19:28 ` [RFC,PATCH 14/35] svc: Change sk_inuse to a kref Tom Tucker
2007-10-03 11:12 ` Christoph Hellwig
2007-10-03 14:39 ` Tom Tucker
2007-10-03 14:45 ` J. Bruce Fields
2007-10-03 14:52 ` Christoph Hellwig
2007-10-03 15:11 ` J. Bruce Fields
2007-10-03 15:15 ` Christoph Hellwig
2007-10-08 3:52 ` Neil Brown
2007-10-03 15:13 ` Chuck Lever
2007-10-03 15:34 ` J. Bruce Fields
2007-10-04 2:51 ` Greg Banks
2007-10-01 19:28 ` [RFC, PATCH 15/35] svc: Move sk_flags to the svc_xprt structure Tom Tucker
2007-10-01 19:28 ` [RFC, PATCH 16/35] svc: Move sk_server and sk_pool to svc_xprt Tom Tucker
2007-10-01 19:28 ` [RFC,PATCH 17/35] svc: Make close transport independent Tom Tucker
2007-10-01 19:28 ` [RFC,PATCH 18/35] svc: Move sk_reserved to svc_xprt Tom Tucker
2007-10-01 19:28 ` [RFC, PATCH 19/35] svc: Make the enqueue service transport neutral and export it Tom Tucker
2007-10-01 19:28 ` [RFC,PATCH 20/35] svc: Make svc_send transport neutral Tom Tucker
2007-10-02 16:15 ` Chuck Lever
2007-10-02 16:46 ` Tom Tucker
2007-10-02 16:54 ` Chuck Lever
2007-10-04 2:59 ` Greg Banks
2007-10-01 19:28 ` [RFC, PATCH 21/35] svc: Change svc_sock_received to svc_xprt_received and export it Tom Tucker
2007-10-02 16:18 ` Chuck Lever
2007-10-01 19:28 ` [RFC,PATCH 22/35] svc: Remove sk_lastrecv Tom Tucker
2007-10-01 19:28 ` [RFC,PATCH 23/35] svc: Move the authinfo cache to svc_xprt Tom Tucker
2007-10-01 19:28 ` [RFC, PATCH 24/35] svc: Make deferral processing xprt independent Tom Tucker
2007-10-01 19:28 ` [RFC, PATCH 25/35] svc: Move the sockaddr information to svc_xprt Tom Tucker
2007-10-02 16:34 ` Chuck Lever
2007-10-02 16:50 ` Tom Tucker
2007-10-01 19:28 ` [RFC, PATCH 26/35] svc: Make svc_sock_release svc_xprt_release Tom Tucker
2007-10-01 19:28 ` [RFC,PATCH 27/35] svc: Make svc_recv transport neutral Tom Tucker
2007-10-02 16:36 ` Chuck Lever
2007-10-01 19:28 ` [RFC, PATCH 28/35] svc: Make svc_age_temp_sockets svc_age_temp_transports Tom Tucker
2007-10-01 19:28 ` [RFC, PATCH 29/35] svc: Move common create logic to common code Tom Tucker
2007-10-02 16:42 ` Chuck Lever
2007-10-02 16:51 ` Tom Tucker
2007-10-01 19:28 ` [RFC, PATCH 30/35] svc: Removing remaining references to rq_sock in rqstp Tom Tucker
2007-10-01 19:28 ` [RFC, PATCH 31/35] svc: Make svc_check_conn_limits xprt independent Tom Tucker
2007-10-01 19:28 ` [RFC, PATCH 32/35] svc: Move the xprt independent code to the svc_xprt.c file Tom Tucker
2007-10-01 19:28 ` [RFC, PATCH 33/35] svc: Add transport hdr size for defer/revisit Tom Tucker
2007-10-01 19:28 ` [RFC,PATCH 34/35] svc: Add /proc/sys/sunrpc/transport files Tom Tucker
2007-10-01 19:28 ` [RFC, PATCH 35/35] knfsd: Support adding transports by writing portlist file Tom Tucker
2007-10-02 15:25 ` [RFC,PATCH 00/35] SVC Transport Switch J. Bruce Fields
2007-10-02 16:18 ` Tom Tucker
2007-10-03 11:03 ` Greg Banks
2007-10-03 14:02 ` Tom Tucker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1191441669.1918.8.camel@trinity.ogc.int \
--to=tom@opengridcomputing.com \
--cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
--cc=gnb@sgi.com \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=nfs@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.