From: Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com>
To: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
Cc: Ethan Solomita <solo@google.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, ak@suse.de,
mtk-manpages@gmx.net, eric.whitney@hp.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC 4/5] Mem Policy: cpuset-independent interleave policy
Date: Tue, 09 Oct 2007 15:02:29 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1191956550.5252.21.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0710091148220.32730@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
On Tue, 2007-10-09 at 11:49 -0700, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Mon, 8 Oct 2007, Ethan Solomita wrote:
>
> > Do we want do_get_mempolicy() to return a policy number with
> > MPOL_CONTEXT set? That's what's happening with this patch, and I expect it'll
> > confuse userland apps, e.g. numactl.
>
> Do we have a consistent way to deal with MPOL_CONTEXT now? I thought this
> was just to test some ideas.
Not sure your meaning, here, Christoph. Ethan did find a bug in my
patch. That WAS an RFC, I believe. I plan on reissuing that patch
along with the other cleanups after Mel's stuff goes in, as I'm
currently testing my patches atop his. I have a couple of other
independent, and more urgent fixes that I'll post as soon as I finish
testing.
Lee
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-10-09 19:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 83+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-08-30 18:50 [PATCH/RFC 0/5] Memory Policy Cleanups and Enhancements Lee Schermerhorn
2007-08-30 18:51 ` [PATCH/RFC 1/5] Mem Policy: fix reference counting Lee Schermerhorn
2007-09-11 18:48 ` Mel Gorman
2007-09-11 18:12 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-09-13 9:45 ` Mel Gorman
2007-08-30 18:51 ` [PATCH/RFC 2/5] Mem Policy: Use MPOL_PREFERRED for system-wide default policy Lee Schermerhorn
2007-09-11 18:54 ` Mel Gorman
2007-09-11 18:22 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-09-13 9:48 ` Mel Gorman
2007-08-30 18:51 ` [PATCH/RFC 3/5] Mem Policy: MPOL_PREFERRED fixups for "local allocation" Lee Schermerhorn
2007-09-11 18:58 ` Mel Gorman
2007-09-11 18:34 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-09-12 22:10 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-09-13 13:51 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-09-13 18:18 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-09-13 9:55 ` Mel Gorman
2007-09-12 22:06 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-09-13 13:35 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-09-13 18:21 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-08-30 18:51 ` [PATCH/RFC 4/5] Mem Policy: cpuset-independent interleave policy Lee Schermerhorn
2007-09-12 21:20 ` Ethan Solomita
2007-09-12 22:14 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-09-13 13:26 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-09-13 17:17 ` Ethan Solomita
2007-09-12 21:59 ` Ethan Solomita
2007-09-13 13:32 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-09-13 17:19 ` Ethan Solomita
2007-09-13 18:20 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-10-09 6:15 ` Ethan Solomita
2007-10-09 13:39 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-10-09 18:49 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-10-09 19:02 ` Lee Schermerhorn [this message]
2007-08-30 18:51 ` [PATCH/RFC 5/5] Mem Policy: add MPOL_F_MEMS_ALLOWED get_mempolicy() flag Lee Schermerhorn
2007-09-11 19:07 ` Mel Gorman
2007-09-11 18:42 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-09-12 22:14 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-09-14 20:24 ` [PATCH] " Lee Schermerhorn
2007-09-14 20:27 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-09-11 16:20 ` [PATCH/RFC 0/5] Memory Policy Cleanups and Enhancements Lee Schermerhorn
2007-09-11 19:12 ` Mel Gorman
2007-09-11 18:45 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-09-12 22:17 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-09-13 13:57 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-09-13 15:31 ` Mel Gorman
2007-09-13 15:01 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-09-13 18:55 ` Mel Gorman
2007-09-13 18:19 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-09-13 18:23 ` Mel Gorman
2007-09-13 18:26 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-09-13 21:17 ` Andrew Morton
2007-09-14 2:20 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-09-14 8:53 ` Mel Gorman
2007-09-14 15:06 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-09-14 17:46 ` Mel Gorman
2007-09-14 18:41 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-09-16 18:02 ` Mel Gorman
2007-09-17 18:12 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-09-17 18:19 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-09-17 20:14 ` Mel Gorman
2007-09-17 19:16 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-09-17 20:03 ` Mel Gorman
2007-09-14 20:15 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-09-16 18:05 ` Mel Gorman
2007-09-16 19:34 ` Andrew Morton
2007-09-16 21:22 ` Mel Gorman
2007-09-17 13:29 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-09-17 18:14 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-09-13 15:49 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-09-13 18:22 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-09-17 19:00 ` [PATCH] Fix NUMA Memory Policy Reference Counting Lee Schermerhorn
2007-09-17 19:14 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-09-17 19:38 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-09-17 19:43 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-09-19 22:03 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-09-19 22:23 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-09-18 10:36 ` Mel Gorman
2007-09-17 19:32 ` [PATCH] 2.6.23-rc6: " Lee Schermerhorn
2007-09-17 19:37 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-09-17 20:19 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-09-17 21:23 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-09-17 22:25 ` Andi Kleen
2007-09-18 19:30 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-09-17 22:28 ` Andi Kleen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1191956550.5252.21.camel@localhost \
--to=lee.schermerhorn@hp.com \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=clameter@sgi.com \
--cc=eric.whitney@hp.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mtk-manpages@gmx.net \
--cc=solo@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.