From: Nicholas Miell <nmiell@comcast.net>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.23
Date: Tue, 09 Oct 2007 23:12:20 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1191996740.8694.7.camel@entropy> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.0.999.0710091346490.5039@woody.linux-foundation.org>
On Tue, 2007-10-09 at 13:54 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> Finally.
>
> Yeah, it got delayed, not because of any huge issues, but because of
> various bugfixes trickling in and causing me to reset my "release clock"
> all the time. But it's out there now, and hopefully better for the wait.
>
> Not a whole lot of changes since -rc9, although there's a few updates to
> mips, sparc64 and blackfin in there. Ignoring those arch updates, there's
> basically a number of mostly one-liners (mostly in drivers, but there's
> some networking fixes and soem VFS/VM fixes there too).
>
> Shortlog and diffstat appended (both relative to -rc9, of course - the
> full log from 2.6.22 is on kernel.org as usual).
>
> I want this to be what people look at for a few days, but expect the x86
> merge to go ahead after that. So far, all indications are still that it's
> going to be all smooth sailing, but hey, those indicators seem to always
> say that, and only after the fact do people notice any problems ;)
>
> Linus
Does CFS still generate the following sysbench graphs with 2.6.23, or
did that get fixed?
http://people.freebsd.org/~kris/scaling/linux-pgsql.png
http://people.freebsd.org/~kris/scaling/linux-mysql.png
(There's also some interesting FreeBSD vs. Linux graphs in
http://people.freebsd.org/~kris/scaling/Scalability%20Update.pdf , but
AFAIK those comparisons are more indicative of glibc malloc performance
than Linux performance.)
--
Nicholas Miell <nmiell@comcast.net>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-10-10 6:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-10-09 20:54 Linux 2.6.23 Linus Torvalds
2007-10-10 6:12 ` Nicholas Miell [this message]
2007-10-10 10:14 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-10-11 1:20 ` Nicholas Miell
2007-10-11 2:34 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2007-10-11 13:32 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-10-11 9:16 ` Nick Piggin
2007-10-12 5:46 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-10-11 14:15 ` Nick Piggin
2007-10-12 12:21 ` Bill Davidsen
2007-10-10 7:44 ` René Rebe
2007-10-10 8:37 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2007-10-10 9:12 ` Michael Tokarev
2007-10-10 10:36 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2007-10-10 10:53 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-10-10 11:13 ` Michael Tokarev
2007-10-10 19:14 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-10-10 19:26 ` Michael Tokarev
2007-10-10 20:04 ` Andi Kleen
2007-10-10 23:27 ` Krzysztof Halasa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1191996740.8694.7.camel@entropy \
--to=nmiell@comcast.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.