From: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
To: Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov>
Cc: selinux@tycho.nsa.gov, dwalsh@redhat.com, cpebenito@tresys.com
Subject: Re: debugging confined domain with gdb
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 15:50:26 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1192045826.3202.40.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1192044685.2687.88.camel@moss-spartans.epoch.ncsc.mil>
On Wed, 2007-10-10 at 15:31 -0400, Stephen Smalley wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-10-10 at 15:28 -0400, Eric Paris wrote:
> > So I've hit on this, and now I've run into 2 other people who had
> > problems using the targeted policy when they attempt to use gdb to trace
> > a running process in a confined domain.
> >
> > The example today was:
> > gdb /sbin/audispd $(pidof audispd)
> >
> > type=SYSCALL msg=audit(1192471243.328:5985): arch=c000003e syscall=61 success=no exit=-13 a0=4bf6 a1=7fff23dfb32c
> > a2=ffffffff80000000 a3=0 items=0 ppid=11732 pid=11792 auid=0 uid=0 gid=0 euid=0 suid=0 fsuid=0 egid=0 sgid=0
> > fsgid=0 tty=pts0 comm="gdb" exe="/usr/bin/gdb" subj=root:system_r:unconfined_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023 key=(null)
> >
> > type=AVC msg=audit(1192471243.328:5985): avc: denied { signal } for pid=11792 comm="gdb"
> > scontext=root:system_r:auditd_t:s0 tcontext=root:system_r:unconfined_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023 tclass=process
> >
> > Basically audispd now needs to be able to signal back to the unconfined
> > gdb process.
> >
> > So, policy gurus, I want gdb to work out of the box. I also don't want
> > to generically give everything in the world signal to unconfined_t
> > permissions. What options do I have in policy, run gdb in an unconfined
> > domain and give every single other domain signal permission to it? Is
> > there an easy way to do that without thousands upon thousands of new
> > rules?
> >
> > I probably can do something horrible in the kernel like if my signal is
> > denied then go back and check "if A can ptrace B then B can signal A"
> > but this probably wouldn't go over well in some environments *evil grin*
> >
> > So how do I make gdb and friends work out of the box? Developers having
> > to turn off selinux (ok, so i just load a policy module) to debug their
> > work just isn't working and more....
>
> Is this related to bug 232371?
looks like it yes (adds self to that bz), but this is just me and 2
other people internally getting mad that stuff doesn't work :)
-Eric
--
This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list.
If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@tycho.nsa.gov with
the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-10-10 19:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-10-10 19:28 debugging confined domain with gdb Eric Paris
2007-10-10 19:31 ` Stephen Smalley
2007-10-10 19:48 ` Stephen Smalley
2007-10-10 19:50 ` Eric Paris [this message]
2007-10-11 14:13 ` Daniel J Walsh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1192045826.3202.40.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=eparis@redhat.com \
--cc=cpebenito@tresys.com \
--cc=dwalsh@redhat.com \
--cc=sds@tycho.nsa.gov \
--cc=selinux@tycho.nsa.gov \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.