From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:59645 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754108AbXJOONb (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Oct 2007 10:13:31 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH] move wlan_*_association_work from header to c file From: Dan Williams To: Holger Schurig Cc: Christoph Hellwig , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, libertas-dev@lists.infradead.org In-Reply-To: <200710150918.02708.hs4233@mail.mn-solutions.de> References: <200710111151.06989.hs4233@mail.mn-solutions.de> <20071011141642.GA6976@infradead.org> <1192114234.31895.5.camel@localhost.localdomain> <200710150918.02708.hs4233@mail.mn-solutions.de> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 10:13:08 -0400 Message-Id: <1192457588.12009.5.camel@localhost.localdomain> (sfid-20071015_151333_367807_3C7EF42E) Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, 2007-10-15 at 09:18 +0200, Holger Schurig wrote: > > wlan_set_essid -> lts_set_essid > > wlan_private -> lts_private > > > > (I don't really like 'lbs' personally but I'm not that > > strongly against it) > > I've used lbs_XXX and LBS_DEB_xxx for the debugging stuff. Do you > want to get that changed to lts_XXX and LTS_DEB_xxx, too? > > (I personally like lbs more, but am also not strongly for it or > against something else, I just want to keep things orthogonal) I don't really care. You've already done the work for 'lbs' so that's fine by me. Dan