From: Hollis Blanchard <hollisb-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
To: Avi Kivity <avi-atKUWr5tajBWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
Cc: kvm-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org,
kvm-ppc-devel
<kvm-ppc-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org>,
"Zhang,
Xiantao" <xiantao.zhang-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Split kvm_vcpu to support new archs.
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 14:18:01 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1193080681.27520.32.camel@basalt> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <471AF450.9040202-atKUWr5tajBWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
On Sun, 2007-10-21 at 08:40 +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
>
> The usage of the macro is only for an intermediate stage, so this
> patch shows the changes in the data structures, while the next one
> will be littered with code changes due to the changes in the way
> fields are addressed.
OK.
What is the plan here Xiantao? If I want to begin PPC integration,
should I submit some patches too (hopefully in areas where we will not
conflict)? Or should I just review your submissions and hold off on PPC
code changes until the dust settles?
> I was initially in favor of doing
>
> struct kvm_vcpu {
> struct kvm_vcpu_common common;
> ...
> };
>
> in order to avoid the majority of fields requiring an 'arch.' prefix
> (most fields are arch dependent, very few are common), but using
> container_of() as someone suggested seems to be a better idea.
Note: container_of() enables the above layout, and I agree with that
approach. To avoid misunderstandings, this is what we're talking about:
kvm_common_foo(struct kvm_vcpu_common *vcpu)
{
kvm_arch_foo(vcpu);
}
kvm_common_bar(struct kvm_vcpu_common *vcpu)
{
...
}
----------
struct kvm_vcpu_ppc440 {
struct kvm_vcpu_common common;
u32 gpr[32];
};
#define to_ppc440(v) container_of(...)
kvm_arch_foo(struct kvm_vcpu_common *vcpu)
{
struct kvm_vcpu_ppc440 *ppc440 = to_ppc440(vcpu);
ppc440->gpr[3] = 0;
kvm_common_bar(ppc440->common);
}
I've chosen specific PPC names since I expect to support more than one
PowerPC processor type simultaneously, e.g. "modprobe kvm-powerpc-440
kvm-powerpc-e500". (This will require some additional "kvm_ppc_ops"
support not shown here.)
Personally I think "common" is too much typing, but I've left the name
as you suggested for now. :)
--
Hollis Blanchard
IBM Linux Technology Center
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-10-22 19:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-10-18 7:34 [PATCH] Split kvm_vcpu to support new archs Zhang, Xiantao
[not found] ` <42DFA526FC41B1429CE7279EF83C6BDC809A6A-wq7ZOvIWXbMAbVU2wMM1CrfspsVTdybXVpNB7YpNyf8@public.gmane.org>
2007-10-18 14:22 ` Avi Kivity
2007-10-18 20:01 ` Hollis Blanchard
2007-10-18 21:04 ` Anthony Liguori
[not found] ` <4717CA4B.7040307-rdkfGonbjUSkNkDKm+mE6A@public.gmane.org>
2007-10-18 21:14 ` Hollis Blanchard
2007-10-18 21:31 ` Anthony Liguori
[not found] ` <4717D095.40708-rdkfGonbjUSkNkDKm+mE6A@public.gmane.org>
2007-10-18 21:43 ` [kvm-ppc-devel] " Hollis Blanchard
2007-10-18 22:04 ` Anthony Liguori
[not found] ` <4717D87E.5010000-rdkfGonbjUSkNkDKm+mE6A@public.gmane.org>
2007-10-19 17:16 ` Hollis Blanchard
2007-10-19 13:34 ` Carsten Otte
2007-10-21 6:40 ` Avi Kivity
[not found] ` <471AF450.9040202-atKUWr5tajBWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
2007-10-22 19:18 ` Hollis Blanchard [this message]
2007-10-23 12:14 ` Carsten Otte
[not found] ` <471DE5B2.4030709-tA70FqPdS9bQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2007-10-24 11:44 ` Zhang, Xiantao
2007-10-25 2:56 ` Jerone Young
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1193080681.27520.32.camel@basalt \
--to=hollisb-r/jw6+rmf7hqt0dzr+alfa@public.gmane.org \
--cc=avi-atKUWr5tajBWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=kvm-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org \
--cc=kvm-ppc-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org \
--cc=xiantao.zhang-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.