From: Hollis Blanchard <hollisb-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
To: "Zhang, Xiantao" <xiantao.zhang-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Cc: kvm-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org,
kvm-ppc-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org,
Jerone Young <jyoung5-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [kvm-ppc-devel] [PATCH 1 of 3] Move x86 kvmcallback structure tokvmctl-x86.h header
Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2007 22:00:57 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1193626857.17368.41.camel@basalt> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <42DFA526FC41B1429CE7279EF83C6BDC8B5292-wq7ZOvIWXbMAbVU2wMM1CrfspsVTdybXVpNB7YpNyf8@public.gmane.org>
On Mon, 2007-10-29 at 10:41 +0800, Zhang, Xiantao wrote:
> Anthony Liguori wrote:
> > Hollis Blanchard wrote:
> >>> I don't know the privious story about this thread, but now I can't
> >>> understand the move. Why do we move all the structure to
> >>> arch-specific ? For IA64 side, almostly we can reuse them directly,
> >>> and just see some special fields as arch-specific. So, I think, we
> >>> should keep common fields in kvmctl.h.
> >>>
> >>
> >> Are you suggesting that kvm_callbacks should be the union of all
> >> callbacks used on all architectures, and for any given architecture
> >> only a subset are actually used?
> >>
> >
> > I think two separate callback structures would make more sense.
> >
> > Quite a few of the callbacks should have common implementations. For
> > instance, all of the io callbacks and the io_window callback should be
> > the same. I would expect most architectures have a concept of a
> > "halt" so that should probably be the same too. That pretty much
> > covers the majority of the callbacks structure :-)
>
> Agree.
OK, are you changing your position then? Anthony is saying there should
be multiple callback data structure definitions, but that the
*implementations* of some of those callbacks should be shared. For
example:
ia64.h:
struct kvm_callbacks {
...
.inb = pio_inb,
};
x86.h:
struct kvm_callbacks {
...
.inb = pio_inb,
};
pio.c (built only for ia64 and x86):
int pio_inb(port) {
...
}
--
Hollis Blanchard
IBM Linux Technology Center
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-10-29 3:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-10-29 0:42 [PATCH 0 of 3] kvmctl code refactoring part 1 Jerone Young
2007-10-29 0:42 ` [PATCH 1 of 3] Move x86 kvmcallback structure to kvmctl-x86.h header Jerone Young
2007-10-29 1:13 ` [PATCH 1 of 3] Move x86 kvmcallback structure tokvmctl-x86.h header Zhang, Xiantao
[not found] ` <42DFA526FC41B1429CE7279EF83C6BDC8B51E0-wq7ZOvIWXbMAbVU2wMM1CrfspsVTdybXVpNB7YpNyf8@public.gmane.org>
2007-10-29 2:04 ` [kvm-ppc-devel] " Hollis Blanchard
2007-10-29 2:17 ` Anthony Liguori
[not found] ` <472542B8.9070105-rdkfGonbjUSkNkDKm+mE6A@public.gmane.org>
2007-10-29 2:41 ` Zhang, Xiantao
[not found] ` <42DFA526FC41B1429CE7279EF83C6BDC8B5292-wq7ZOvIWXbMAbVU2wMM1CrfspsVTdybXVpNB7YpNyf8@public.gmane.org>
2007-10-29 3:00 ` Hollis Blanchard [this message]
2007-10-29 3:53 ` Anthony Liguori
2007-10-29 2:41 ` [kvm-ppc-devel] [PATCH 1 of 3] Move x86kvmcallback " Zhang, Xiantao
[not found] ` <42DFA526FC41B1429CE7279EF83C6BDC8B528F-wq7ZOvIWXbMAbVU2wMM1CrfspsVTdybXVpNB7YpNyf8@public.gmane.org>
2007-10-29 2:56 ` Hollis Blanchard
2007-10-29 2:11 ` [PATCH 1 of 3] Move x86 kvmcallback structure to kvmctl-x86.h header Anthony Liguori
[not found] ` <4725415B.4020601-rdkfGonbjUSkNkDKm+mE6A@public.gmane.org>
2007-10-29 3:14 ` [kvm-ppc-devel] " Hollis Blanchard
2007-10-29 3:50 ` Anthony Liguori
[not found] ` <47255892.2090308-rdkfGonbjUSkNkDKm+mE6A@public.gmane.org>
2007-10-29 4:14 ` Hollis Blanchard
2007-10-29 14:12 ` Anthony Liguori
2007-10-30 4:31 ` Avi Kivity
2007-10-29 0:42 ` [PATCH 2 of 3] Move kvm_context structure to kvmctl.h header Jerone Young
2007-10-29 1:28 ` [PATCH 2 of 3] Move kvm_context structure to kvmctl.hheader Zhang, Xiantao
2007-10-29 2:08 ` [PATCH 2 of 3] Move kvm_context structure to kvmctl.h header Anthony Liguori
2007-10-29 7:18 ` Izik Eidus
2007-10-29 0:42 ` [PATCH 3 of 3] Move x86 specific properties of kvm_init to own file Jerone Young
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1193626857.17368.41.camel@basalt \
--to=hollisb-r/jw6+rmf7hqt0dzr+alfa@public.gmane.org \
--cc=jyoung5-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=kvm-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org \
--cc=kvm-ppc-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org \
--cc=xiantao.zhang-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.