From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: James Andrewartha Subject: Re: linux-ata.org contributions Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2007 00:41:52 +0900 Message-ID: <1194795712.2865.2.camel@zarvora> References: <47362C63.7080108@garzik.org> <47362C9B.6090809@garzik.org> <20071110230324.3647cdf5@the-village.bc.nu> <4736395D.1080102@garzik.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from outbound.icp-qv1-irony-out1.iinet.net.au ([203.59.1.108]:35105 "EHLO outbound.icp-qv1-irony-out1.iinet.net.au" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753506AbXKKPlz (ORCPT ); Sun, 11 Nov 2007 10:41:55 -0500 In-Reply-To: <4736395D.1080102@garzik.org> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Jeff Garzik Cc: Alan Cox , IDE/ATA development list , Tejun Heo , Albert Lee On Sat, 2007-11-10 at 18:06 -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote: > Alan Cox wrote: > > On Sat, 10 Nov 2007 17:11:39 -0500 > > Jeff Garzik wrote: > > > >> Jeff Garzik wrote: > >>> Whenever you want to update or add a page, just send a 'git pull' > >>> request to me... > >> > >> Or patches, if you wish to avoid git. > > > > Bad idea IMHO > > > > You ask Jeff to pull some updates, they go wrong, the website looks a > > mess, Jeff goes to the pub. > > > > There's an immediacy about the display of web content that often benefits > > from an immediacy of updates/fixing. The web just isn't batch processed. > > I wouldn't push it out unless it looked OK in my browser. > > But overall I tend to dislike wikis. They enable collaboration, but > tend to be uniformly ugly, cumbersome, and CPU intensive. What about ikiwiki? It's a wiki backed by an RCS, which can be git. http://ikiwiki.info/ and http://ikiwiki.info/rcs/git/ James Andrewartha