From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
To: schwidefsky@de.ibm.com
Cc: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 3/3] arch_rebalance_pgtables call
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 21:06:36 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1195034796.28865.36.camel@pasglop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1195032394.9446.6.camel@localhost>
On Wed, 2007-11-14 at 10:26 +0100, Martin Schwidefsky wrote:
> That patch allows processes to have different number of page table
> levels, 31 bit processes have 2 levels (2GB), normal 64 bit processes
> have 3 levels (4TB) and really big 64 bit processes can have 4 levels
> (8PB). The downgrade of a page table to use less levels than the
> parent
> process is done in arch_pick_mmap_layout. The upgrade is done by using
> the arch_rebalance_pgtables call. I've considered using the
> arch_get_unmapped_area but got scared by the indirection in
> get_unmapped_area:
>
> get_area = current->mm->get_unmapped_area;
> if (file && file->f_op && file->f_op->get_unmapped_area)
> get_area = file->f_op->get_unmapped_area;
> addr = get_area(file, addr, len, pgoff, flags);
Don't be, it's really only hugetlb and other arch specific stuff that
hook in here on platforms with an MMU (It's also used by /dev/mem etc...
for mmu-less platforms but you don't care).
Ben.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-11-14 10:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-11-12 14:30 [patch 0/3] page table changes schwidefsky
2007-11-12 14:30 ` [patch 1/3] add mm argument to pte/pmd/pud/pgd_free schwidefsky
2007-11-12 14:30 ` [patch 2/3] CONFIG_HIGHPTE vs. sub-page page tables schwidefsky
2008-01-02 20:44 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-01-02 21:24 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2008-01-02 21:28 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-01-03 13:12 ` Andi Kleen
2008-01-03 14:01 ` Boaz Harrosh
2008-02-01 23:15 ` Andrew Morton
2008-02-01 23:15 ` Andrew Morton
2008-02-03 5:37 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-02-03 5:53 ` Andrew Morton
2008-02-03 6:46 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-02-04 10:36 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2008-02-04 10:51 ` Andrew Morton
2008-02-04 11:02 ` Russell King
2008-02-04 11:14 ` Andrew Morton
2008-02-05 14:39 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2008-02-05 18:46 ` Andrew Morton
2008-02-06 9:06 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2008-02-06 9:09 ` Andrew Morton
2008-02-06 9:15 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-02-06 15:50 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2007-11-12 14:30 ` [patch 3/3] arch_rebalance_pgtables call schwidefsky
2007-11-13 12:33 ` Nick Piggin
2007-11-14 9:26 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2007-11-14 10:06 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt [this message]
2007-11-14 11:49 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2007-11-14 22:07 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-11-15 17:13 ` Martin Schwidefsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1195034796.28865.36.camel@pasglop \
--to=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
--cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.