From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Tim E. Real" Subject: Single vs. multiple seq client ports Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2015 19:44:26 -0500 Message-ID: <11961012.AHGMH1UnbJ@col-desktop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from nm1-vm3.access.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com (nm1-vm3.access.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com [216.109.114.74]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54C272604F8 for ; Wed, 4 Feb 2015 01:44:37 +0100 (CET) List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org Hi. Our app currently uses a single alsa midi seq client port to address all external midi ports. I have an opportunity now to change this to allow as many client ports as desired, for example one client port for each external port found. If I proceed, it is possible the user may have many client ports if desired. What are the advantages and disadvantages if any, in terms of speed and resources, of having a single client port versus multiple client ports? Thanks. Tim.