From: Michael Ellerman <michael@ellerman.id.au>
To: Li Li <r64360@freescale.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>,
Kumar Gala <kumar.gala@freescale.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add IPIC MSI interrupt support
Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2007 15:02:01 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1196654521.13554.32.camel@concordia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1196394519.29683.8.camel@Guyver>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 15736 bytes --]
Hi r64360,
A few comments below :)
On Fri, 2007-11-30 at 11:48 +0800, Li Li wrote:
> The IPIC MSI is introduced on MPC837x chip.
> Implements the IPIC MSI as two level interrupt controller.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tony Li <tony.li@freescale.com>
> ---
> arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc8377_mds.dts | 14 ++
> arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc8378_mds.dts | 14 ++
> arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc8379_mds.dts | 14 ++
> arch/powerpc/platforms/83xx/Kconfig | 6 +
> arch/powerpc/platforms/83xx/mpc837x_mds.c | 11 +
> arch/powerpc/sysdev/Makefile | 1 +
> arch/powerpc/sysdev/ipic_msi.c | 359 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/asm-powerpc/ipic_msi.h | 54 +++++
> 8 files changed, 473 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 arch/powerpc/sysdev/ipic_msi.c
> create mode 100644 include/asm-powerpc/ipic_msi.h
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc8377_mds.dts b/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc8377_mds.dts
> index 1f7819e..1068fe2 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc8377_mds.dts
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc8377_mds.dts
> @@ -210,6 +210,20 @@
> #interrupt-cells = <2>;
> reg = <700 100>;
> };
> +
> + ipic-msi@7c0 {
> + compatible = "fsl,ipic-msi";
> + reg = <7c0 40>;
> + interrupts = < 43 8
> + 4 8
> + 51 8
> + 52 8
> + 56 8
> + 57 8
> + 58 8
> + 59 8 >;
> + interrupt-parent = < &ipic >;
> + };
> };
>
> pci@e0008500 {
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc8378_mds.dts b/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc8378_mds.dts
> index 1503ae3..f12658f 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc8378_mds.dts
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc8378_mds.dts
> @@ -192,6 +192,20 @@
> #interrupt-cells = <2>;
> reg = <700 100>;
> };
> +
> + ipic-msi@7c0 {
> + compatible = "fsl,ipic-msi";
> + reg = <7c0 40>;
> + interrupts = < 43 8
> + 4 8
> + 51 8
> + 52 8
> + 56 8
> + 57 8
> + 58 8
> + 59 8 >;
> + interrupt-parent = < &ipic >;
> + };
> };
>
> pci@e0008500 {
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc8379_mds.dts b/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc8379_mds.dts
> index cdb4426..9fe4bd2 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc8379_mds.dts
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc8379_mds.dts
> @@ -236,6 +236,20 @@
> #interrupt-cells = <2>;
> reg = <700 100>;
> };
> +
> + ipic-msi@7c0 {
> + compatible = "fsl,ipic-msi";
> + reg = <7c0 40>;
> + interrupts = < 43 8
> + 4 8
> + 51 8
> + 52 8
> + 56 8
> + 57 8
> + 58 8
> + 59 8 >;
> + interrupt-parent = < &ipic >;
> + };
> };
>
> pci@e0008500 {
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/83xx/Kconfig b/arch/powerpc/platforms/83xx/Kconfig
> index 00154c5..4c51f78 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/83xx/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/83xx/Kconfig
> @@ -88,6 +88,12 @@ config PPC_MPC837x
> select FSL_SERDES
> default y if MPC837x_MDS
>
> +config IPIC_MSI
> + bool
> + depends on PCI_MSI
> + default y if PPC_MPC837x
> + default n
> +
> config PPC_MPC83XX_PCIE
> bool "MPC837X PCI Express support"
> depends on PCIEPORTBUS && PPC_MPC837x
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/83xx/mpc837x_mds.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/83xx/mpc837x_mds.c
> index 6048f1b..dbea34b 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/83xx/mpc837x_mds.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/83xx/mpc837x_mds.c
> @@ -17,6 +17,9 @@
>
> #include <asm/time.h>
> #include <asm/ipic.h>
> +#if CONFIG_IPIC_MSI
> +#include <asm/ipic_msi.h>
> +#endif
> #include <asm/udbg.h>
> #include <asm/prom.h>
I'd rather you just include it unconditionally.
> @@ -84,6 +87,14 @@ static void __init mpc837x_mds_init_IRQ(void)
> * in case the boot rom changed something on us.
> */
> ipic_set_default_priority();
> +
> +#if CONFIG_IPIC_MSI
> + np = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, "fsl,ipic-msi");
> + if (!np)
> + return;
> +
> + ipic_msi_init(np, ipic_msi_cascade);
> +#endif
If you have a no-op version of ipic_msi_init() in your header file then
you can remove the #ifdef in the C code - which I think is nicer.
Why do you pass the handler into the init routine, rather than have the
init routine just set the handler. Then you could make the handler
static.
> }
>
> /*
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/Makefile b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/Makefile
> index 99a77d7..5946b6a 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/Makefile
> @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ ifeq ($(CONFIG_PPC_MERGE),y)
> obj-$(CONFIG_PPC_INDIRECT_PCI) += indirect_pci.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_PPC_I8259) += i8259.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_PPC_83xx) += ipic.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_IPIC_MSI) += ipic_msi.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_4xx) += uic.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_XILINX_VIRTEX) += xilinx_intc.o
> endif
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/ipic_msi.c b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/ipic_msi.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..57758f7
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/ipic_msi.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,359 @@
> +/*
> + * arch/powerpc/sysdev/ipic_msi.c
> + *
> + * IPIC MSI routines implementations.
> + *
> + * Auther: Tony Li <tony.li@freescale.com>
> + *
> + * Copyright (c) 2007 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc.
> + *
> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it
> + * under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the
> + * Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or (at your
> + * option) any later version.
> + */
> +
> +
> +#include <linux/pci.h>
> +#include <linux/msi.h>
> +#include <linux/irq.h>
> +
> +#include <asm/ipic_msi.h>
> +
> +#define MSIR0 0x43
> +#define MSIR1 0x4
> +#define MSIR2 0x51
> +#define MSIR3 0x52
> +#define MSIR4 0x56
> +#define MSIR5 0x57
> +#define MSIR6 0x58
> +#define MSIR7 0x59
> +
> +
> +static struct ipic_msi *ipic_msi;
> +static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(ipic_msi_lock);
> +static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(ipic_msi_bitmap_lock);
> +
> +static inline u32 ipic_msi_read(volatile u32 __iomem *base, unsigned int reg)
> +{
> + return in_be32(base + (reg >> 2));
> +}
> +
> +static inline void ipic_msi_write(volatile u32 __iomem *base,
> + unsigned int reg, u32 value)
> +{
> + out_be32(base + (reg >> 2), value);
> +}
> +
> +static struct ipic_msi * ipic_msi_from_irq(unsigned int virq)
> +{
> + return ipic_msi;
> +}
> +
> +#define ipic_msi_irq_to_hw(virq) ((unsigned int)irq_map[virq].hwirq)
What's wrong with virq_to_hw() ?
> +static void ipic_msi_unmask(unsigned int virq)
> +{
> + struct ipic_msi *msi = ipic_msi_from_irq(virq);
> + unsigned int src = ipic_msi_irq_to_hw(virq);
> + unsigned long flags;
> + u32 temp;
> +
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&ipic_msi_lock, flags);
> + temp = ipic_msi_read(msi->regs, IPIC_MSIMR);
> + ipic_msi_write(msi->regs, IPIC_MSIMR,
> + temp & ~(1 << (src / msi->int_per_msir)));
> +
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ipic_msi_lock, flags);
> +}
> +
> +static void ipic_msi_mask(unsigned int virq)
> +{
> + struct ipic_msi *msi = ipic_msi_from_irq(virq);
> + unsigned int src = ipic_msi_irq_to_hw(virq);
> + unsigned long flags;
> + u32 temp;
> +
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&ipic_msi_lock, flags);
> +
> + temp = ipic_msi_read(msi->regs, IPIC_MSIMR);
> + ipic_msi_write(msi->regs, IPIC_MSIMR,
> + temp | (1 << (src / msi->int_per_msir)));
> +
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ipic_msi_lock, flags);
> +}
> +/*
> + * We do not need this actually. The MSIR register has been read once
> + * in ipic_msi_get_irq. So, this MSI interrupt has been acked
> + */
> +static void ipic_msi_ack(unsigned int virq)
> +{
> + struct ipic_msi *msi = ipic_msi_from_irq(virq);
> + unsigned int src = ipic_msi_irq_to_hw(virq);
> + unsigned long flags;
> +
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&ipic_msi_lock, flags);
> +
> + ipic_msi_read(msi->regs, IPIC_MSIR0 + (4 * (src / msi->int_per_msir)));
> +
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ipic_msi_lock,flags);
> +}
> +
> +static struct irq_chip ipic_msi_chip = {
> + .typename = " IPIC MSI ",
> + .unmask = ipic_msi_unmask,
> + .mask = ipic_msi_mask,
> + .ack = ipic_msi_ack,
> +};
> +
> +static int ipic_msi_host_map(struct irq_host *h, unsigned int virq,
> + irq_hw_number_t hw)
> +{
> + struct ipic_msi *msi = h->host_data;
> + struct irq_chip *chip = msi->hc_irq;
> +
> + set_irq_chip_data(virq, msi);
> + get_irq_desc(virq)->status |= IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING;
> +
> + set_irq_chip_and_handler(virq, chip, handle_edge_irq);
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static struct irq_host_ops ipic_msi_host_ops = {
> + .map = ipic_msi_host_map,
> +};
> +
> +irq_hw_number_t ipic_msi_alloc_hwirqs(struct ipic_msi *msi, int num)
> +{
> + unsigned long flags;
> + int offset, order = get_count_order(num);
> +
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&ipic_msi_bitmap_lock, flags);
> +
> + offset = bitmap_find_free_region(msi->ipic_msi_bitmap,
> + msi->nr_msir * msi->int_per_msir, order);
> +
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ipic_msi_bitmap_lock, flags);
> +
> + pr_debug("%s: allocated 0x%x (2^%d) at offset 0x%x\n",
> + __FUNCTION__, num, order, offset);
> +
> + return offset;
> +}
> +
> +void ipic_msi_free_hwirqs(struct ipic_msi *msi, int offset, int num)
> +{
> + unsigned long flags;
> + int order = get_count_order(num);
> +
> + pr_debug("%s: freeing 0x%x (2^%d) at offset 0x%x\n",
> + __FUNCTION__, num, order, offset);
> +
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&ipic_msi_bitmap_lock, flags);
> + bitmap_release_region(msi->ipic_msi_bitmap, offset, order);
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ipic_msi_bitmap_lock, flags);
> +}
> +
> +static int ipic_msi_init_allocator(struct ipic_msi *msi)
> +{
> + int size;
> +
> + size = BITS_TO_LONGS(msi->nr_msir * msi->int_per_msir) * sizeof(long);
> + msi->ipic_msi_bitmap = alloc_maybe_bootmem(size, GFP_KERNEL);
> +
> + if (msi->ipic_msi_bitmap == NULL) {
> + pr_debug("%s: ENOMEM allocating allocator bitmap!\n",
> + __FUNCTION__);
> + return -ENOMEM;
> + }
> + memset(msi->ipic_msi_bitmap, 0, size);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
The last three routines are almost identical to the mpic_msi.c ones, if
in future we have a third implementation that looks almost identical
maybe we should consolidate them.
> +
> +static void ipic_msi_compose_msg(struct ipic_msi *msi, int hwirq,
> + struct msi_msg *msg)
> +{
> + unsigned int srs;
> + unsigned int ibs;
> +
> + srs = hwirq / msi->int_per_msir;
> + ibs = hwirq - srs * msi->int_per_msir;
> +
> + msg->address_lo = msi->msi_addr_lo;
> + msg->address_hi = msi->msi_addr_hi;
> + msg->data = (srs << 5) | (ibs & 0x1F);
> +
> + pr_debug("%s: allocated srs: %d, ibs: %d\n",
> + __FUNCTION__, srs, ibs);
> +
> +}
> +
> +static int ipic_msi_setup_irqs(struct pci_dev *pdev, int nvec, int type)
> +{
> + struct ipic_msi *msi = ipic_msi;
> + irq_hw_number_t hwirq;
> + unsigned int virq;
> + struct msi_desc *entry;
> + struct msi_msg msg;
> +
> + list_for_each_entry(entry, &pdev->msi_list, list) {
> + hwirq = ipic_msi_alloc_hwirqs(msi, 1);
> + if (hwirq < 0) {
> + pr_debug("%s: fail allocating msi interrupt\n",
> + __FUNCTION__);
> + return hwirq;
> + }
> +
> + /* This hwirq belongs to the irq_host other than irq_host of IPIC
> + * So, it is independent to hwirq of IPIC */
> + virq = irq_create_mapping(msi->irqhost, hwirq);
> + if (virq == NO_IRQ) {
> + pr_debug("%s: fail mapping hwirq 0x%lx\n",
> + __FUNCTION__, hwirq);
> + ipic_msi_free_hwirqs(msi, hwirq, 1);
> + return -ENOSPC;
> + }
> + set_irq_msi(virq, entry);
> + ipic_msi_compose_msg(msi, hwirq, &msg);
> + write_msi_msg(virq, &msg);
> +
> + hwirq++;
^^^^ this looks like my bug
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void ipic_msi_teardown_irqs(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> +{
> + struct msi_desc *entry;
> + struct ipic_msi *msi = ipic_msi;
> +
> + list_for_each_entry(entry, &pdev->msi_list, list) {
> + if (entry->irq == NO_IRQ)
> + continue;
> + set_irq_msi(entry->irq, NULL);
> + ipic_msi_free_hwirqs(msi, virq_to_hw(entry->irq), 1);
> + irq_dispose_mapping(entry->irq);
> + }
> +
> + return;
> +}
> +
> +void __init ipic_msi_init(struct device_node *node,
> + void (*handler)(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc))
> +{
> + struct ipic_msi *msi;
> + struct resource res;
> + int i;
> + int rc = 0;
> +
> + msi = alloc_maybe_bootmem(sizeof(*msi), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (msi == NULL)
> + return;
> +
> + memset(msi, 0, sizeof(*msi));
> +
> +
> + msi->irqhost = irq_alloc_host(of_node_get(node), IRQ_HOST_MAP_LINEAR,
> + NR_MSIR, &ipic_msi_host_ops, 0);
> + if (msi->irqhost == NULL) {
> + of_node_put(node);
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + rc = of_address_to_resource(node, 0, &res);
> + if (rc) {
> + of_node_put(node);
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + msi->regs = ioremap(res.start, res.end - res.start + 1);
> + msi->irqhost->host_data = msi;
> + msi->hc_irq = &ipic_msi_chip;
> +
> + msi->msi_addr_lo = 0xE00007F8;
> + msi->msi_addr_hi = 0;
> + msi->nr_msir = ARRAY_SIZE(msi->msir);
> + msi->int_per_msir = 32;
> + for (i = 0; i < msi->nr_msir; i++) {
> + unsigned int virt_msir = irq_of_parse_and_map(node, i);
> + if (virt_msir != NO_IRQ) {
> + set_irq_data(virt_msir, msi);
> + set_irq_chained_handler(virt_msir, handler);
> + msi->msir[i] = virt_msir;
> + } else
> + msi->msir[i] = NO_IRQ;
> + }
> +
> + rc = ipic_msi_init_allocator(msi);
> + if (rc)
< missing of_node_put() ? >
> + goto out;
> +
> + ipic_msi = msi;
> +
> + WARN_ON(ppc_md.setup_msi_irqs);
> + ppc_md.setup_msi_irqs = ipic_msi_setup_irqs;
> + ppc_md.teardown_msi_irqs = ipic_msi_teardown_irqs;
> +
return ?
> +out:
> + if (mem_init_done)
> + kfree(msi);
> +
> + return;
> +}
> +
> +static int ipic_msi_get_irq(struct ipic_msi *msi, int virt_msir)
> +{
> + int msir = -1;
> + unsigned int temp;
> + unsigned int offset;
> + int i;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < msi->nr_msir; i++)
> + if (virt_msir == msi->msir[i]) {
> + msir = i;
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + if (i >= msi->nr_msir)
> + return NO_IRQ;
> +
> + temp = ipic_msi_read(msi->regs, IPIC_MSIR0 + (i * 4));
> + offset = ffs(temp) - 1;
> +
> + return irq_linear_revmap(msi->irqhost, (msir * msi->int_per_msir + offset));
> +}
> +
> +void ipic_msi_cascade(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc)
> +{
> + struct ipic_msi *msi;
> + unsigned int cascade_irq;
> +
> + spin_lock(&desc->lock);
> + if (desc->chip->mask_ack)
> + desc->chip->mask_ack(irq);
> + else {
> + desc->chip->mask(irq);
> + desc->chip->ack(irq);
> + }
> +
> + if (unlikely(desc->status & IRQ_INPROGRESS))
> + goto unlock;
> +
> + desc->status |= IRQ_INPROGRESS;
> + msi = desc->handler_data;
> + cascade_irq = ipic_msi_get_irq(msi, irq);
> +
> + spin_unlock(&desc->lock);
> +
> + if (cascade_irq != NO_IRQ)
> + generic_handle_irq(cascade_irq);
> +
> + spin_lock(&desc->lock);
> + desc->status &= ~IRQ_INPROGRESS;
> + if (!(desc->status & IRQ_DISABLED) && desc->chip->unmask)
> + desc->chip->unmask(irq);
> +
> +unlock:
> + spin_unlock(&desc->lock);
> +}
I don't know your hardware, but this looks a bit weird. Doesn't the
upstream handler do most of this logic for you?
cheers
--
Michael Ellerman
OzLabs, IBM Australia Development Lab
wwweb: http://michael.ellerman.id.au
phone: +61 2 6212 1183 (tie line 70 21183)
We do not inherit the earth from our ancestors,
we borrow it from our children. - S.M.A.R.T Person
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-12-03 4:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-11-30 3:48 [PATCH] Add IPIC MSI interrupt support Li Li
2007-12-03 1:52 ` David Gibson
2007-12-03 4:59 ` Li Li
2007-12-03 4:02 ` Michael Ellerman [this message]
2007-12-03 9:07 ` Li Li
2007-12-03 21:03 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-12-04 1:41 ` Li Li
2007-12-04 5:38 ` Michael Ellerman
2007-12-04 7:51 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-12-04 9:10 ` Li Li
2007-12-04 10:34 ` Li Tony
2007-12-04 12:04 ` Michael Ellerman
2007-12-04 13:13 ` Scott Wood
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1196654521.13554.32.camel@concordia \
--to=michael@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=kumar.gala@freescale.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=r64360@freescale.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.