From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@infradead.org>
To: Shane <gnome42@gmail.com>
Cc: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>, Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org>,
Brandon Philips <brandon@ifup.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
video4linux-list <video4linux-list@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] videobuf-core.c locking fixes
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 07:26:15 -0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1197624375.4632.44.camel@gaivota> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fa4052ef0712121322h3ce78a39ve4fd1e10fafe3d15@mail.gmail.com>
Em Qua, 2007-12-12 às 16:22 -0500, Shane escreveu:
> > Yes it does! I was just going to send the same patch myself :)
>
> But, I am now seeing some errors that weren't there in 2.6.23
>
> kernel: bttv0: SCERR @ 1fa0401c,bits: HSYNC OFLOW SCERR*
> last message repeated 15 times
> kernel: bttv0: timeout: drop=16 irq=105615/105615, risc=1fa0401c,
> bits: HSYNC OFLOW
> kernel: bttv0: reset, reinitialize
> kernel: bttv0: PLL can sleep, using XTAL (28636363).
>
> kernel: bttv0: SCERR @ 1fa0401c,bits: HSYNC OFLOW SCERR*
> last message repeated 15 times
> kernel: bttv0: timeout: drop=16 irq=106741/106741, risc=1fa0401c,
> bits: HSYNC OFLOW
> kernel: bttv0: reset, reinitialize
> kernel: bttv0: PLL can sleep, using XTAL (28636363).
>
> These happen occasionally and it causes an EIO DQBUF
> error and the application has to re queue the buffers but it
> recovers OK. Not sure if it causes some sort of internal
> kernel corruption that will only be noticed later possibly?
>
> I am using 15 userptr buffers so whatever is happening may
> be happening once per buffer sometimes. dunno
You may see such troubles with weak signals, where bttv is not capable of getting the proper sync.
--
Cheers,
Mauro
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-12-14 9:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-12-12 5:20 2.6.24-rc5 "videobuf_read_start" [drivers/media/video/videobuf-dvb.ko] undefined! Shane
2007-12-12 9:07 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-12-12 11:03 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2007-12-12 12:03 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-12-12 14:21 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2007-12-12 16:37 ` Shane
2007-12-12 18:57 ` Shane
2007-12-12 19:44 ` [2.6 patch] videobuf-core.c locking fixes Adrian Bunk
2007-12-12 20:35 ` Shane
2007-12-12 21:22 ` Shane
2007-12-14 9:26 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab [this message]
2007-12-13 9:59 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2007-12-12 22:19 ` 2.6.24-rc5 "videobuf_read_start" [drivers/media/video/videobuf-dvb.ko] undefined! Jean Delvare
2007-12-13 10:33 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2007-12-12 10:36 ` Soeren Sonnenburg
2007-12-12 10:51 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1197624375.4632.44.camel@gaivota \
--to=mchehab@infradead.org \
--cc=brandon@ifup.org \
--cc=bunk@kernel.org \
--cc=bunk@stusta.de \
--cc=gnome42@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=video4linux-list@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.