Re: Time for cell code reshuffle?

[Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>]

On Fri, 2007-12-21 at 20:15 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > It seems platforms/cell should have the shared and/or generic code,
> and the other
> > stuff moved into a new platform directory, but is it worth the
> effort? 
> 
> There is very little code in platforms/cell that can not be generic,
> so I think
> it's not worth splitting it. The only IBM blade specific files are
> cbe_cpufreq_pmi.c and parts of setup.c and pervasive.c. Everything
> else could
> be shared by about any generic implementation without a hypervisor.

Another option is to have:

platforms/celleb -> platforms/beat

and withing platforms/cell, rename blade specific files to
something (can't find what, works on CAB too) and add celleb
"bare metal" files.

A platform directly doesn't have to deal with one platform. For example,
platforms/44x contains a lot of board support.

Now, one question is how far can we merge celleb support with the common
blade/CAB code...

Cheers,
Ben.