From: Yi Yang <yi.y.yang@intel.com>
To: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, lenb@kernel.org,
acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [PATCH linux-acpi] Remove superfluous code and correct counting error in function acpi_system_write_alarm
Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2007 16:41:39 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1198744900.3640.4.camel@yangyi-dev.bj.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1198738022.8950.3.camel@yangyi-dev.bj.intel.com>
In function acpi_system_write_alarm in file drivers/acpi/sleep/proc.c,
big sec, min, hr, mo, day and yr are counted twice to get reasonable
values, that is very superfluous, we can do that only once.
In additon, /proc/acpi/alarm can set a related value which can be
specified as YYYY years MM months DD days HH hours MM minutes SS
senconds, it isn't a date, so you can specify as +0000-00-00 96:00:00
, that means 3 days later, current code can't handle such a case.
This patch removes unnecessary code and does with the aforementioned
situation.
Before applying this patch:
[root@localhost /]# cat /proc/acpi/alarm
2007-12-00 00:00:00
[root@localhost /]# echo "0000-00-00 96:180:180" > /proc/acpi/alarm
[root@localhost /]# cat /proc/acpi/alarm
0007-12-02 **:**:**
[root@localhost /]#
After applying this patch:
[root@localhost ~]# echo "2007-12-00 00:00:00" > /proc/acpi/alarm
[root@localhost ~]# cat /proc/acpi/alarm
2007-12-00 00:00:00
[root@localhost ~]# echo "0000-00-00 96:180:180" > /proc/acpi/alarm
[root@localhost ~]# cat /proc/acpi/alarm
0007-12-04 03:03:00
[root@localhost ~]#
Signed-off by Yi Yang <yi.y.yang@intel.com>
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/sleep/proc.c b/drivers/acpi/sleep/proc.c
index fce78fb..f8df521 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/sleep/proc.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/sleep/proc.c
@@ -256,27 +256,6 @@ acpi_system_write_alarm(struct file *file,
if ((result = get_date_field(&p, &sec)))
goto end;
- if (sec > 59) {
- min += 1;
- sec -= 60;
- }
- if (min > 59) {
- hr += 1;
- min -= 60;
- }
- if (hr > 23) {
- day += 1;
- hr -= 24;
- }
- if (day > 31) {
- mo += 1;
- day -= 31;
- }
- if (mo > 12) {
- yr += 1;
- mo -= 12;
- }
-
spin_lock_irq(&rtc_lock);
rtc_control = CMOS_READ(RTC_CONTROL);
@@ -293,24 +272,24 @@ acpi_system_write_alarm(struct file *file,
spin_unlock_irq(&rtc_lock);
if (sec > 59) {
- min++;
- sec -= 60;
+ min += sec/60;
+ sec = sec%60;
}
if (min > 59) {
- hr++;
- min -= 60;
+ hr += min/60;
+ min = min%60;
}
if (hr > 23) {
- day++;
- hr -= 24;
+ day += hr/24;
+ hr = hr%24;
}
if (day > 31) {
- mo++;
- day -= 31;
+ mo += day/32;
+ day = day%32;
}
if (mo > 12) {
- yr++;
- mo -= 12;
+ yr += mo/13;
+ mo = mo%13;
}
spin_lock_irq(&rtc_lock);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-12-27 8:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-12-27 6:47 [PATCH linux-acpi] Fix /proc/acpi/alarm set error Yi Yang
2007-12-27 8:41 ` Yi Yang [this message]
2007-12-29 8:22 ` [PATCH linux-acpi] Correct wakeup set error and append a new column PCI ID Yi Yang
2008-01-01 23:20 ` Pavel Machek
2008-01-02 2:03 ` Yi Yang
2008-01-02 16:09 ` Pavel Machek
2008-01-03 2:02 ` Yi Yang
2008-01-03 2:11 ` Yi Yang
2008-01-04 8:16 ` [PATCH linux-acpi] fix acpi fan state set error Yi Yang
2008-01-07 6:56 ` [PATCH] ACPI: fix processor throttling " Yi Yang
2008-01-08 3:21 ` [PATCH] ACPI: fix processor limit " Yi Yang
2008-01-24 0:45 ` [PATCH] ACPI: create proc entry 'power' only if C2 or C3 is supported Yi Yang
2008-01-24 14:43 ` Mark Lord
2008-01-09 22:21 ` [PATCH] ACPI: Add sysfs interface for acpi device wakeup Yi Yang
2008-01-10 7:43 ` Maxim Levitsky
2008-01-09 23:59 ` Yi Yang
2008-01-10 10:30 ` Matthew Garrett
2008-01-13 18:16 ` Pavel Machek
2008-01-11 8:16 ` Zhang Rui
2008-01-10 23:55 ` Yi Yang
2008-03-19 13:06 ` Thomas Renninger
2008-03-19 14:37 ` Yi Yang
2008-03-20 4:32 ` Zhao Yakui
2008-03-19 18:52 ` David Brownell
2008-03-20 5:12 ` Zhao Yakui
2008-03-20 6:12 ` David Brownell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1198744900.3640.4.camel@yangyi-dev.bj.intel.com \
--to=yi.y.yang@intel.com \
--cc=acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.