All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
To: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Peter Osterlund <petero2@telia.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>,
	Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [patch] scsi: revert "[SCSI] Get rid of scsi_cmnd->done"
Date: Sun, 06 Jan 2008 10:47:51 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1199638071.5205.40.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4780FF85.4020501@panasas.com>


On Sun, 2008-01-06 at 18:19 +0200, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 06 2008 at 5:43 +0200, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > This all still leaves the question unanswered why that commit 
> > 6f5391c283d7fdcf24bf40786ea79061919d1e1d changed any behaviour at all. 
> > Because the thing that Peter is describing has nothing to do with any 
> > low-level drivers what-so-ever.
> > 
> > 		Linus
> > 
> 
> James Matthew.
> I have a (very) wild guess at what maybe have changed with the cmnd->done
> patch:
> 
> Do you remember the effective loop in scsi_lib:scsi_end_request() where
> if bufflen was smaller then original request size, do to truncation
> of bufflen by ULD, then the remaining of the request is re-queued again
> as a new scsi-command. Well I think that the old system would call
> cmnd->done for every iteration, and the new system, since the done is
> called by the block-Q, does not see the resubmit of the new command.

Actually, this is cmnd->done, not req->done we're removing.
cmnd->done() isn't seen by the block layer; all its uses are in the SCSI
mid-layer.

> I have not followed all code path of the matter, but I know that sr does
> alters bufflen in some cases. 
> All this is not a bug in itself, but it is a change in behavior that might 
> cause the current sr hack to fail.

It's a good thought.  You're right, the old code calls done for every
iteration.  However, it calls it in scsi_finish_completion.  The new
code will actually call drv->done() in that same spot for every
iteration as well.

The requeue is done via scsi_requeue_request which calls
blk_requeue_request, which resets the START flag and sends the command
right back through the system (including the prep function because
scsi_requeue_request unpreps the command), so even with the new code
we'll go back through all the same done paths.

James



  reply	other threads:[~2008-01-06 16:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-01-02 16:25 [patch] scsi: revert "[SCSI] Get rid of scsi_cmnd->done" Ingo Molnar
2008-01-02 16:46 ` James Bottomley
2008-01-02 19:19   ` Linus Torvalds
2008-01-02 19:40     ` Matthew Wilcox
2008-01-02 19:57       ` Linus Torvalds
2008-01-02 20:17         ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-01-02 20:49           ` Linus Torvalds
2008-01-02 20:53             ` Matthew Wilcox
2008-01-02 20:18         ` Matthew Wilcox
2008-01-02 20:12       ` James Bottomley
2008-01-02 20:45         ` Linus Torvalds
2008-01-02 23:33           ` James Bottomley
2008-01-03  1:58             ` Linus Torvalds
2008-01-06  2:55               ` Peter Osterlund
2008-01-06  3:43                 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-01-06 10:17                   ` Peter Osterlund
2008-01-06 14:04                   ` James Bottomley
2008-01-06 14:42                   ` James Bottomley
2008-01-06 15:01                     ` Peter Osterlund
2008-01-06 18:14                     ` Linus Torvalds
2008-01-06 18:44                       ` Linus Torvalds
2008-01-06 18:54                         ` James Bottomley
2008-01-06 16:19                   ` Boaz Harrosh
2008-01-06 16:47                     ` James Bottomley [this message]
2008-01-06 13:57                 ` James Bottomley
2008-01-06 14:47                   ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-06 15:20                     ` James Bottomley
2008-01-06 15:45                       ` Adrian Bunk
2008-01-06 16:00                         ` James Bottomley
2008-01-06 16:12                       ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-06 17:10                         ` James Bottomley
2008-01-08 16:55                           ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-06 17:11                       ` Matthew Wilcox
2008-01-06 17:36                         ` James Bottomley
2008-01-06 18:34                           ` Willy Tarreau
2008-01-06 18:56                             ` Adrian Bunk
2008-01-06 19:10                               ` Willy Tarreau
2008-01-06 19:58                                 ` Adrian Bunk
2008-01-06 21:08                                   ` Willy Tarreau
2008-01-06 22:25                                     ` Adrian Bunk
2008-01-07 20:50                                     ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2008-01-07 21:31                                       ` Alan Cox
2008-01-07 21:37                                       ` Matthew Wilcox
2008-01-07 23:04                                         ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2008-01-07 23:19                                           ` Matthew Wilcox
2008-01-08 16:47                                             ` Stefan Richter
2008-01-08 17:11                                               ` Linus Torvalds
2008-01-08 20:01                                                 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-09  4:01                                             ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2008-01-09  4:10                                               ` Andrew Morton
2008-01-09  6:03                                                 ` Willy Tarreau
2008-01-09  4:03                                             ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2008-01-07 15:25                                 ` John Stoffel
2008-01-07 19:04                                   ` Stefan Richter
2008-01-07 19:59                                     ` John Stoffel
2008-01-06 17:29                     ` Stefan Richter
2008-01-06 20:26                       ` Ingo Molnar
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-01-06 13:55 Thomas Meyer
2008-01-06 16:56 ` Matthew Wilcox

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1199638071.5205.40.camel@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bharrosh@panasas.com \
    --cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=matthew@wil.cx \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=petero2@telia.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.