From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.43) id 1JCixs-0007zx-8I for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:00:00 -0500 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JCixq-0007zp-G3 for grub-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Jan 2008 16:59:58 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JCixp-0007zc-3M for grub-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Jan 2008 16:59:58 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JCixo-0007zZ-Ud for grub-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Jan 2008 16:59:56 -0500 Received: from c60.cesmail.net ([216.154.195.49]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JCixo-0007B7-HG for grub-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Jan 2008 16:59:56 -0500 Received: from unknown (HELO relay.cesmail.net) ([192.168.1.81]) by c60.cesmail.net with ESMTP; 09 Jan 2008 16:59:54 -0500 Received: from [192.168.1.21] (static-72-92-88-10.phlapa.fios.verizon.net [72.92.88.10]) by relay.cesmail.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36E66618FE1 for ; Wed, 9 Jan 2008 16:59:54 -0500 (EST) From: Pavel Roskin To: The development of GRUB 2 In-Reply-To: <20080108115758.GA4270@thorin> References: <20080108115758.GA4270@thorin> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2008 16:59:53 -0500 Message-Id: <1199915993.14851.1.camel@dv> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.2 (2.12.2-2.fc8) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. Subject: Re: revision control of `configure' X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: The development of GRUB 2 List-Id: The development of GRUB 2 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2008 21:59:58 -0000 On Tue, 2008-01-08 at 12:57 +0100, Robert Millan wrote: > http://cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewvc/grub2/configure?root=grub&view=log > > Does it make sense to keep `configure' under revision control? Almost every > commit for unrelated things tends to change the whole thing. I suggested it in the days of GRUB 1 but my suggestion didn't get any support. -- Regards, Pavel Roskin