From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.43) id 1JEqDZ-0004gX-02 for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 13:08:57 -0500 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JEqDX-0004fj-B1 for grub-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 13:08:55 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JEqDW-0004f8-0l for grub-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 13:08:55 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JEqDV-0004ey-Kf for grub-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 13:08:53 -0500 Received: from c60.cesmail.net ([216.154.195.49]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JEqDV-0008WS-7u for grub-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 13:08:53 -0500 Received: from unknown (HELO relay.cesmail.net) ([192.168.1.81]) by c60.cesmail.net with ESMTP; 15 Jan 2008 13:08:52 -0500 Received: from [192.168.1.21] (static-72-92-88-10.phlapa.fios.verizon.net [72.92.88.10]) by relay.cesmail.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 699E7618FE1 for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 13:08:52 -0500 (EST) From: Pavel Roskin To: The development of GRUB 2 In-Reply-To: <20080115175926.GA21483@thorin> References: <20080115175926.GA21483@thorin> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 13:08:51 -0500 Message-Id: <1200420531.17542.15.camel@dv> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.2 (2.12.2-3.fc8) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. Subject: Re: [PATCH] Initial i386-ieee1275 support X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: The development of GRUB 2 List-Id: The development of GRUB 2 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 18:08:55 -0000 On Tue, 2008-01-15 at 18:59 +0100, Robert Millan wrote: > This patch adds initial i386-ieee1275 support. Just a few (almost) stupid questions. What hardware is it for? XO? How is it different from i386-linuxbios? Doesn't LinuxBIOS imply OpenBIOS, which is (or strives to be) ieee1275 compliant? -- Regards, Pavel Roskin