From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Clemens Ladisch" Subject: Re: alsa-1.0.16 Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 09:39:28 +0100 Message-ID: <1200645568.26101.1231929665@webmail.messagingengine.com> References: <1200595969.5011.104.camel@razman.gruemaster.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from out3.smtp.messagingengine.com (out3.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.27]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5ED5424819 for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 09:39:29 +0100 (CET) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1200595969.5011.104.camel@razman.gruemaster.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: Tobin Davis Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org Tobin Davis wrote: > What is the cutoff for getting a patch in for new hardware? Support for new hardware shouldn't be a problem as long as it doesn't introduce risk of regressions for old hardware. Regards, Clemens