From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.43) id 1JH0jo-0000zJ-28 for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 12:47:12 -0500 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JH0jm-0000yo-Eb for grub-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 12:47:10 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JH0jl-0000ya-24 for grub-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 12:47:10 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JH0jk-0000yX-Oz for grub-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 12:47:08 -0500 Received: from c60.cesmail.net ([216.154.195.49]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JH0jk-0005s7-PK for grub-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 12:47:08 -0500 Received: from unknown (HELO relay.cesmail.net) ([192.168.1.81]) by c60.cesmail.net with ESMTP; 21 Jan 2008 12:47:07 -0500 Received: from [192.168.1.21] (static-72-92-88-10.phlapa.fios.verizon.net [72.92.88.10]) by relay.cesmail.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21038618FE3 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 12:47:07 -0500 (EST) From: Pavel Roskin To: The development of GRUB 2 In-Reply-To: <20080121165209.GA2557@thorin> References: <20080121165209.GA2557@thorin> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 12:47:06 -0500 Message-Id: <1200937626.4686.17.camel@dv> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.2 (2.12.2-3.fc8) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. Subject: Re: [PATCH] memdisk + grub-mkrescue X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: The development of GRUB 2 List-Id: The development of GRUB 2 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 17:47:11 -0000 On Mon, 2008-01-21 at 17:52 +0100, Robert Millan wrote: > These two were predestined to get together.. attached patch for their > wedding. > > Comments? I really like the ability to add more things than just modules (especially grub.cfg and fonts). Is that the main motivation for your patch? Or you have some other things in mind? I've tested the patch, and it seems to be OK, although I was surprised to see an empty menu on startup. Perhaps a command line would be more appropriate in absence of grub.cfg? I don't quite understand why "biosdisk" needs to be mandatory. I guess it's not initialized by default, so that it doesn't conflict with the ata module. But ata can load on top of biosdisk (but not the other way around). -- Regards, Pavel Roskin