Re: ppc32: Weird process scheduling behaviour with 2.6.24-rc

[Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>]

On Sun, 2008-01-27 at 17:13 +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:

> In summary, there are two separate problems with similar symptoms, which
> had me confused at times:
> 
>       * With CONFIG_FAIR_USER_SCHED disabled, there are severe
>         interactivity hickups with a niced CPU hog and top running. This
>         started with commit 810e95ccd58d91369191aa4ecc9e6d4a10d8d0c8. 

The revert at the bottom causes the wakeup granularity to shrink for +
nice and to grow for - nice. That is, it becomes easier to preempt a +
nice task, and harder to preempt a - nice task.

I think we originally had that; didn't comment it, forgot the reason
changed it because the units didn't match. Another reason might have
been the more difficult preemption of - nice tasks. That might - niced
tasks to cause horrible latencies - Ingo, any recollection?

Are you perhaps running with a very low HZ (HZ=100)? (If wakeup
preemption fails, tick preemption will take over).

Also, could you try lowering:
  /proc/sys/kernel/sched_wakeup_granularity_ns

>       * With CONFIG_FAIR_USER_SCHED enabled, X becomes basically
>         unusable with a niced CPU hog, with or without top running. I
>         don't know when this started, possibly when this option was
>         first introduced.

Srivatsa found an issue that might explain the very bad behaviour under
group scheduling. But I gather you're not at all interested in this
feature?

> FWIW, the patch below (which reverts commit
> 810e95ccd58d91369191aa4ecc9e6d4a10d8d0c8) restores 2.6.24 interactivity
> to the same level as 2.6.23 here with CONFIG_FAIR_USER_SCHED disabled
> (my previous report to the contrary was with CONFIG_FAIR_USER_SCHED
> enabled because I didn't yet realize the difference it makes), but I
> don't know if that's the real fix.
> 
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/sched_fair.c b/kernel/sched_fair.c
> index da7c061..a7cc22a 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched_fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched_fair.c
> @@ -843,7 +843,6 @@ static void check_preempt_wakeup(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
>  	struct task_struct *curr = rq->curr;
>  	struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq = task_cfs_rq(curr);
>  	struct sched_entity *se = &curr->se, *pse = &p->se;
> -	unsigned long gran;
>  
>  	if (unlikely(rt_prio(p->prio))) {
>  		update_rq_clock(rq);
> @@ -866,11 +865,8 @@ static void check_preempt_wakeup(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
>  		pse = parent_entity(pse);
>  	}
>  
> -	gran = sysctl_sched_wakeup_granularity;
> -	if (unlikely(se->load.weight != NICE_0_LOAD))
> -		gran = calc_delta_fair(gran, &se->load);
>  
> -	if (pse->vruntime + gran < se->vruntime)
> +	if (pse->vruntime + sysctl_sched_wakeup_granularity < se->vruntime)
>  		resched_task(curr);
>  }