All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@gmail.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux arch <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
Subject: Re: Are Section mismatches out of control?
Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2008 03:21:34 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1201864894.23523.117.camel@brick> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080201030329.9b760777.akpm@linux-foundation.org>

On Fri, 2008-02-01 at 03:03 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Feb 2008 11:47:18 +0100 Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org> wrote:
> 
> > James said in a related posting that the Section mismatch
> > warnings were getting out of control.
> 
> eh.  They're easy - the build system tells you about them!
> 
> > The list is here:
> 
> Question is: why do people keep adding new ones when they are so easy to
> detect and fix?
> 
> Asnwer: because neither they nor their patch integrators are doing adequate
> compilation testing.

Because if there already exists more than a handful peoples' eyes glaze
over and ignore "just one more warning"

Unless they break the build, or if there currently are 0 and they make
it non-zero, people seem not to care....sad.  Probably the same for
sparse/checkpatch, "there's plenty already, I can't be bothered to look"

Subject to someone _making_ it an issue, can't see it changing.

Harvey


  reply	other threads:[~2008-02-01 11:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-02-01 10:47 Are Section mismatches out of control? Sam Ravnborg
2008-02-01 11:03 ` Andrew Morton
2008-02-01 11:21   ` Harvey Harrison [this message]
2008-02-01 13:30     ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2008-02-01 13:40       ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-02-01 21:22         ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2008-02-01 22:32           ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-02-02 16:42             ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2008-02-02 17:40               ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-02-01 17:02     ` Roland Dreier
2008-02-01 21:47     ` Jan Engelhardt
2008-02-01 22:10       ` James Bottomley
2008-02-01 22:40       ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-02-02  0:01         ` Jan Engelhardt
2008-02-01 14:48   ` Johannes Weiner
2008-02-01 15:00   ` James Bottomley
2008-02-01 16:43   ` Jeff Garzik
2008-02-01 20:17     ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-02-01 20:24       ` Jeff Garzik
2008-02-01 22:38         ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-02-01 11:10 ` Andi Kleen
2008-02-01 21:51   ` Jan Engelhardt
2008-02-02  4:12     ` Andi Kleen
2008-02-01 14:53 ` James Bottomley

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1201864894.23523.117.camel@brick \
    --to=harvey.harrison@gmail.com \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.