From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Denis V. Lunev" Subject: Re: [PATCH] [IPV4]: Remove warning in node_set_parent. Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 11:11:58 +0300 Message-ID: <1202803918.13118.24.camel@iris.sw.ru> References: <1202719637-4925-1-git-send-email-den@openvz.org> <20080211114849.042a3da2@extreme> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, devel@openvz.org To: Stephen Hemminger Return-path: Received: from mailhub.sw.ru ([195.214.232.25]:43965 "EHLO relay.sw.ru" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750834AbYBLIL7 (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Feb 2008 03:11:59 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20080211114849.042a3da2@extreme> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: ugly :), but Acked-by: Denis V. Lunev On Mon, 2008-02-11 at 11:48 -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > On Mon, 11 Feb 2008 11:47:17 +0300 > "Denis V. Lunev" wrote: > > > net/ipv4/fib_trie.c: In function 'node_set_parent': > > net/ipv4/fib_trie.c:184: warning: assignment makes integer from pointer > > without a cast > > > > Signed-off-by: Denis V. Lunev > > --- > > net/ipv4/fib_trie.c | 7 ++++--- > > 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/net/ipv4/fib_trie.c b/net/ipv4/fib_trie.c > > index f5fba3f..1753cd4 100644 > > --- a/net/ipv4/fib_trie.c > > +++ b/net/ipv4/fib_trie.c > > @@ -177,10 +177,11 @@ static inline struct tnode *node_parent_rcu(struct node *node) > > return rcu_dereference(ret); > > } > > > > -static inline void node_set_parent(struct node *node, struct tnode *ptr) > > +static inline void node_set_parent(struct node *node, struct tnode *__ptr) > > { > > - rcu_assign_pointer(node->parent, > > - (unsigned long)ptr | NODE_TYPE(node)); > > + struct node *ptr; > > + ptr = (struct node *)((unsigned long)__ptr | NODE_TYPE(node)); > > + rcu_assign_pointer(node->parent, ptr); > > } > > > > static inline struct node *tnode_get_child(struct tnode *tn, unsigned int i) > > No, this causes new warning from assigning pointer (ptr) to integer node->parent. > > Why not just change rcupdate.h to do the right thing. > > >From a00f7cbf1c2f2282eced236e1e8b99b0fecd213a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Stephen Hemminger > Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 11:28:13 -0800 > Subject: [PATCH] eliminate warnings when rcu_assign_pointer is used with unsigned long > > It is reasonable to use RCU with non-pointer values, and describe > the optimization. > > Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger > --- > include/linux/rcupdate.h | 13 +++++++------ > 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/include/linux/rcupdate.h b/include/linux/rcupdate.h > index 37a642c..c44ac87 100644 > --- a/include/linux/rcupdate.h > +++ b/include/linux/rcupdate.h > @@ -172,14 +172,15 @@ struct rcu_head { > * structure after the pointer assignment. More importantly, this > * call documents which pointers will be dereferenced by RCU read-side > * code. > + * > + * If value is the NULL (constant 0), then no barrier is needed. > */ > > -#define rcu_assign_pointer(p, v) \ > - ({ \ > - if (!__builtin_constant_p(v) || \ > - ((v) != NULL)) \ > - smp_wmb(); \ > - (p) = (v); \ > +#define rcu_assign_pointer(p, v) \ > + ({ \ > + if (!(__builtin_constant_p(v) && v)) \ > + smp_wmb(); \ > + (p) = (v); \ > }) > > /** > -- > 1.5.3.8 > > > >