From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ryusuke Konishi Subject: Re: Re: users Digest, Vol 23, Issue 6 Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 13:41:24 +0900 Message-ID: <1202877685.2990.43.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <20080213030002.1FEBA4CC7C2@www.osrg.net> <816a605f0802121907y4928936ej262167d7037cbadc@mail.gmail.com> Reply-To: NILFS Users mailing list Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <816a605f0802121907y4928936ej262167d7037cbadc-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: users-bounces-JrjvKiOkagjYtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org Errors-To: users-bounces-JrjvKiOkagjYtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: NILFS Users mailing list Hello, On Tue, 2008-02-12 at 19:07 -0800, mark perino wrote: > Konishi-san, > > Could you hold off on nilfs2.0.0 until the leak bug has been > identified and fixed? 2.0.0 should indicate a stable release. > We very much appreciate your hard work! You're quite right. All right, I'll prioritize clear-up of the leak problem over the non -testing release. On the other hand, we are backlogged on enough minor changes from the previous release, so we would like to consider one more -testing release if needed. Thanks for your advice, -- Ryusuke Konishi NILFS team NTT http://www.nilfs.org/