From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mx3.redhat.com (mx3.redhat.com [172.16.48.32]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m1JMuvPA030781 for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2008 17:56:57 -0500 Received: from mail-in-13.arcor-online.net (mail-in-13.arcor-online.net [151.189.21.53]) by mx3.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m1JMuPN5031619 for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2008 17:56:25 -0500 From: hermann pitton To: Patrick Boettcher In-Reply-To: References: <1203434275.6870.25.camel@tux> <1203457264.8019.6.camel@anden.nu> <1203459408.28796.19.camel@youkaida> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 23:50:40 +0100 Message-Id: <1203461440.5358.2.camel@pc08.localdom.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: video4linux-list@redhat.com, linux-dvb@linuxtv.org, Nicolas Will Subject: Re: [linux-dvb] [patch] support for key repeat with dib0700 ir receiver List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: video4linux-list-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: video4linux-list-bounces@redhat.com List-ID: Am Dienstag, den 19.02.2008, 23:29 +0100 schrieb Patrick Boettcher: > Hi, > > On Tue, 19 Feb 2008, Nicolas Will wrote: > >> I would suggest creating a netlink device which lircd (or similar) can > >> read from. > > > > Be ready to discount my opinion, I'm not too good at those things. > > > > Wouldn't going away from an event interface kill a possible direct link > > between the remote and X? > > > > The way I see it, LIRC is an additional layer that may be one too many > > in most cases. From my point of view, it is a relative pain I could do > > without. But I may have tunnel vision by lack of knowledge. > > I agree with you. I'm more looking for a solution with existing things. > LIRC is not in kernel. I don't think we should do something specific, new. > If there is nothing which can be done with the event system I think we > should either extend it or just drop this idea. > > What about HID? > > Patrick. > Hi, for what we have ir-common then already? Did not look in any details, but we have a hook there, also for RC5 remotes. Cheers, Hermann -- video4linux-list mailing list Unsubscribe mailto:video4linux-list-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/video4linux-list