From: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
To: BlueZ development <bluez-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bluez-devel] [PATCH] Updated sendto
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 21:36:43 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1203971803.28528.91.camel@californication> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1203936997.2754.198.camel@cookie.hadess.net>
Hi Bastien,
> > So current patch is not acceptable. It is actually bad. So first
> > action must be to remove all these useless comments. An example is this:
> >
> > + /* Go into main loop */
> > gtk_main();
> >
> > Put comments where the code is unclear and not were everybody knows
> > what it is doing. This is a perfect example of wrongly commenting code.
>
> Done locally.
do you have an updated patch or do I have to do it by myself.
> > Second of all, I am unhappy with all this usage of gtk_main_quit() in
> > various functions. Can we not just structure the code a lot more
> > cleaner to avoid multiple calls of it.
>
> I don't understand what you mean there.
What I currently got from code review is that we simply call
gtk_main_quit() instead of having a little bit better structured code.
Just stopping the mainloop at more then 1 or 2 places doesn't seem right
to me. Feel free to convince me otherwise.
> > Besides the signal handling, I
> > would expect one extra call in case we automatically wanna close the
> > progress dialog.
>
> Why? If there's no errors, why would you want to see it's finished? What
> information would be in the dialogue that could be useful?
That behavior is fine with me. However that was not what I said. So I
expect two gtk_main_quit() inside the code. One for SIGTERM and one when
we are actually done with the transfer.
Regards
Marcel
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Bluez-devel mailing list
Bluez-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bluez-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-02-25 20:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-01-17 10:43 [Bluez-devel] [PATCH] Allow multiple files to be sent Bastien Nocera
2008-01-18 13:43 ` Bastien Nocera
2008-02-01 13:14 ` Bastien Nocera
2008-02-01 16:08 ` Bastien Nocera
2008-02-01 16:20 ` Bastien Nocera
2008-02-06 12:18 ` [Bluez-devel] [PATCH] Updated sendto Bastien Nocera
2008-02-06 13:08 ` Bastien Nocera
2008-02-07 0:59 ` Bastien Nocera
2008-02-23 1:30 ` Bastien Nocera
2008-02-24 18:29 ` Bastien Nocera
2008-02-25 2:21 ` Marcel Holtmann
2008-02-25 10:56 ` Bastien Nocera
2008-02-25 20:36 ` Marcel Holtmann [this message]
2008-02-26 1:18 ` Bastien Nocera
2008-02-26 1:21 ` Marcel Holtmann
2008-02-27 1:28 ` Bastien Nocera
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1203971803.28528.91.camel@californication \
--to=marcel@holtmann.org \
--cc=bluez-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.