From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@hp.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 0/3] xen: Extend xen kexec hypercall to
	return additional regions
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 08:36:00 -0700
Message-ID: <1204212960.24352.51.camel@bling>
References: <20080227070105.949799153@vergenet.net>
	<1204142152.6798.32.camel@lappy> <20080228033516.GA16840@verge.net.au>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
In-Reply-To: <20080228033516.GA16840@verge.net.au>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>, xen-ia64-devel@lists.xensource.com
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org


On Thu, 2008-02-28 at 12:35 +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
> I'll come right out and say that I don't fancy this two stage .c
> indirectly including itself approach. And I hope this change can help us
> move away from there, as well as providing the functionality
> extendability that this patch set describes.

   Wow, that's pretty nasty.  Thanks for the explanation.

	Alex

-- 
Alex Williamson                             HP Open Source & Linux Org.