diff for duplicates of <1204281823.6243.78.camel@lappy> diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt index 78640d0..b19d11b 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N1/1.txt @@ -11,3 +11,9 @@ On Fri, 2008-02-29 at 16:55 +0800, Zhao Forrest wrote: No, rdtsc() goes directly to the hardware. You need a (preferably cheap) clock abstraction layer on top if you need this. + + +------------------------------------------------------------------------- +This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft +Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. +http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest index 7493405..6bdb9e4 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N1/content_digest @@ -3,8 +3,8 @@ "Subject\0Re: Can Linux kernel handle unsynced TSC?\0" "Date\0Fri, 29 Feb 2008 11:43:43 +0100\0" "To\0Zhao Forrest <forrest.zhao@gmail.com>\0" - "Cc\0linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" - " kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net\0" + "Cc\0kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net" + " linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org\0" "\00:1\0" "b\0" "\n" @@ -19,6 +19,12 @@ "> returned by the first rdtsc()?\n" "\n" "No, rdtsc() goes directly to the hardware. You need a (preferably cheap)\n" - clock abstraction layer on top if you need this. + "clock abstraction layer on top if you need this.\n" + "\n" + "\n" + "-------------------------------------------------------------------------\n" + "This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft\n" + "Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.\n" + http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ -8a0b3f5c7f6e149a61079ae9b52adb9bac47e78dc9bd69ad51500e0fc3247414 +08c4d4b084b8858677c0fe85c9bd947050bf8222ea1f0f6eca963709716dddb5
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.