diff for duplicates of <1204295241.6243.108.camel@lappy> diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt index e4ff0b3..39fec03 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N1/1.txt @@ -20,3 +20,9 @@ On Fri, 2008-02-29 at 22:20 +0800, Zhao Forrest wrote: Yes, gtod is one such a layer, however it fails the 'cheap' test for many definitions of cheap. + + +------------------------------------------------------------------------- +This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft +Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. +http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest index 7be6b76..860e87f 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N1/content_digest @@ -5,8 +5,8 @@ "Subject\0Re: Can Linux kernel handle unsynced TSC?\0" "Date\0Fri, 29 Feb 2008 15:27:21 +0100\0" "To\0Zhao Forrest <forrest.zhao@gmail.com>\0" - "Cc\0linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" - " kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net\0" + "Cc\0kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net" + " linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org\0" "\00:1\0" "b\0" "\n" @@ -30,6 +30,12 @@ "> of clock abstraction layer, am I right?\n" "\n" "Yes, gtod is one such a layer, however it fails the 'cheap' test for\n" - many definitions of cheap. + "many definitions of cheap.\n" + "\n" + "\n" + "-------------------------------------------------------------------------\n" + "This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft\n" + "Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.\n" + http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ -88c5664104a662a93dac99ca4a4def56a9af8eec8d0f10f7b2bda52b56851f2e +354b91e9d2b6379f6439ddab4411b35f75be3aaee941bb029668220d682c2196
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.