From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [194.106.48.114] (helo=tim.rpsys.net ident=0) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1JWaCo-0000Nz-91 for openembedded-devel@openembedded.org; Tue, 04 Mar 2008 17:41:32 +0100 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m24GeDJ1018930 for ; Tue, 4 Mar 2008 16:40:13 GMT Received: from tim.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tim.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 18782-04 for ; Tue, 4 Mar 2008 16:40:09 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [192.168.1.3] (dax.rpnet.com [192.168.1.3]) (authenticated bits=0) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m24Ge6th018922 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 4 Mar 2008 16:40:06 GMT From: Richard Purdie To: openembedded-devel@openembedded.org In-Reply-To: <200803041729.55760.thomas.cooksey@trolltech.com> References: <200803041240.17891.thomas.cooksey@trolltech.com> <200803041729.55760.thomas.cooksey@trolltech.com> Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2008 16:40:05 +0000 Message-Id: <1204648806.8117.6.camel@dax.rpnet.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.1 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rpsys.net X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 194.106.48.114 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: rpurdie@rpsys.net X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3 (2007-08-08) on serenity X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=5.0 tests=RDNS_NONE autolearn=no version=3.2.3 X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Tue, 21 Aug 2007 23:39:36 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on linuxtogo.org) Subject: Re: Missing includes in STAGING_INCDIR X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2008 16:41:32 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Tue, 2008-03-04 at 17:29 +0100, Tom Cooksey wrote: > On Tuesday 04 March 2008 17:05:09 Richard Purdie wrote: > > On Tue, 2008-03-04 at 13:56 +0100, Tom Cooksey wrote: > > > Yup, we like pkgconfig too, saves us a lot of work. :-) Sadly, we have to support > > > qt being built on 3rd party toolchains we have no access to and therefore no > > > way to modify. pkg-config caused a headache for support so we've dropped it > > > by default when cross-compiling. Hopefully we'll re-enable it in the future as > > > the pkg-config devs seem to be working on the problem, providing an env > > > variable you can use to set a sysroot prefix (PKG_CONFIG_SYSROOT). > > > > Just for reference, it was OE users (well, Poky) who argued for that to > > be introduced into pkgconfig to escape the mangling that we used to > > do[1] ;-) > > > > [1] We're literally in the process of removing that today. > > Awesome! Well argued. :-) Does that mean PKG_CONFIG_SYSROOT is stable > enough now to be used in anger? Poky has been using it for a while without too many problems and OE has just switched to it. It seems to work well although it does highlight there are some badly written pkgconfig files around... Cheers, Richard