From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kukjin Kim Subject: RE: [PATCH] ARM: EXYNOS: Fix support of Exynos4210 rev0 SoC Date: Thu, 23 May 2013 10:11:17 +0900 Message-ID: <120501ce5752$6daef380$490cda80$%kim@samsung.com> References: <1368630484-29939-1-git-send-email-t.figa@samsung.com> <1623377.nVo7nUcid2@flatron> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailout4.samsung.com ([203.254.224.34]:41169 "EHLO mailout4.samsung.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756084Ab3EWBLT (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 May 2013 21:11:19 -0400 Received: from epcpsbgr4.samsung.com (u144.gpu120.samsung.co.kr [203.254.230.144]) by mailout4.samsung.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7u4-24.01 (7.0.4.24.0) 64bit (built Nov 17 2011)) with ESMTP id <0MN800H988MS1Q80@mailout4.samsung.com> for linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org; Thu, 23 May 2013 10:11:18 +0900 (KST) In-reply-to: Content-language: ko Sender: linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org To: 'Kukjin Kim' , 'Tomasz Figa' , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: 'Tomasz Figa' , linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, arnd@arndb.de, 'Kyungmin Park' , olof@lixom.net Kukjin Kim wrote: > > Tomasz Figa wrote: > > > > Hi Kukjin, > > > Hi, > > > On Wednesday 15 of May 2013 17:08:04 Tomasz Figa wrote: > > > This patch extends exynos_init_time() function to handle Exynos4210 > rev0 > > > SoC, which differs in availability of system timers and needs > different > > > clocksource initialization. > > > > > > This makes it possible to use exynos_init_time() function as init_time > > > callback for all Exynos-based boards, including Universal_C210, which > > > originally had to use samsung_timer_init(). > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Tomasz Figa > > > Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park > > > --- > > > arch/arm/mach-exynos/Kconfig | 3 ++- > > > arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.c | 30 > > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.h > > > | 2 ++ > > > arch/arm/mach-exynos/mach-universal_c210.c | 5 ++--- > > > 4 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > > > Could you pick this patch to your fixes branch? > > > Yeah, I will after looking at. > > > This is a fix of a regression in handling Exynos4210 rev0 SoC (e.g. > > Universal C210 board) introduced by patches merged to 3.10. > > > OK, I see but I didn't review yet and I will within a couple of days ;-) > OK, looks fine, this will be sent to upstream during -rc for v3.10. But, Tomasz, as you know, non-DT supporting files will be gone away in v3.11, just note. Thanks. - Kukjin From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: kgene.kim@samsung.com (Kukjin Kim) Date: Thu, 23 May 2013 10:11:17 +0900 Subject: [PATCH] ARM: EXYNOS: Fix support of Exynos4210 rev0 SoC References: <1368630484-29939-1-git-send-email-t.figa@samsung.com> <1623377.nVo7nUcid2@flatron> Message-ID: <120501ce5752$6daef380$490cda80$%kim@samsung.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Kukjin Kim wrote: > > Tomasz Figa wrote: > > > > Hi Kukjin, > > > Hi, > > > On Wednesday 15 of May 2013 17:08:04 Tomasz Figa wrote: > > > This patch extends exynos_init_time() function to handle Exynos4210 > rev0 > > > SoC, which differs in availability of system timers and needs > different > > > clocksource initialization. > > > > > > This makes it possible to use exynos_init_time() function as init_time > > > callback for all Exynos-based boards, including Universal_C210, which > > > originally had to use samsung_timer_init(). > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Tomasz Figa > > > Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park > > > --- > > > arch/arm/mach-exynos/Kconfig | 3 ++- > > > arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.c | 30 > > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.h > > > | 2 ++ > > > arch/arm/mach-exynos/mach-universal_c210.c | 5 ++--- > > > 4 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > > > Could you pick this patch to your fixes branch? > > > Yeah, I will after looking at. > > > This is a fix of a regression in handling Exynos4210 rev0 SoC (e.g. > > Universal C210 board) introduced by patches merged to 3.10. > > > OK, I see but I didn't review yet and I will within a couple of days ;-) > OK, looks fine, this will be sent to upstream during -rc for v3.10. But, Tomasz, as you know, non-DT supporting files will be gone away in v3.11, just note. Thanks. - Kukjin