All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
To: jeff@garzik.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, liml@rtr.ca,
	alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, kngregertsen@norway.atmel.com,
	sonic.adi@gmail.com, rmk@arm.linux.org.uk,
	alessandro.zummo@towertech
Cc: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH 8/9] libata: kill port_info->sht and ->irq_handler
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 21:06:04 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <12052371683661-git-send-email-htejun@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <12052371651181-git-send-email-htejun@gmail.com>

libata core layer doesn't care about sht or ->irq_handler.  Those are
only of interest to the LLD during initialization.  This is confusing
and has caused several drivers to have duplicate unused initializers
for these fields.

Currently only sata_nv uses these fields.  Make sata_nv use
->private_data, which is supposed to carry LLD-specific information,
instead and kill ->sht and ->irq_handler.  nv_pi_priv structure is
defined and struct literals are used to initialize private_data.
Notational overhead is negligible.

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/ata/sata_nv.c  |   29 +++++++++++++++++------------
 include/linux/libata.h |    2 --
 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/ata/sata_nv.c b/drivers/ata/sata_nv.c
index 7b7ba0e..5637b08 100644
--- a/drivers/ata/sata_nv.c
+++ b/drivers/ata/sata_nv.c
@@ -466,58 +466,61 @@ static struct ata_port_operations nv_swncq_ops = {
 	.port_start		= nv_swncq_port_start,
 };
 
+struct nv_pi_priv {
+	irq_handler_t			irq_handler;
+	struct scsi_host_template	*sht;
+};
+
+#define NV_PI_PRIV(_irq_handler, _sht) \
+	&(struct nv_pi_priv){ .irq_handler = _irq_handler, .sht = _sht }
+
 static const struct ata_port_info nv_port_info[] = {
 	/* generic */
 	{
-		.sht		= &nv_sht,
 		.flags		= ATA_FLAG_SATA | ATA_FLAG_NO_LEGACY,
 		.pio_mask	= NV_PIO_MASK,
 		.mwdma_mask	= NV_MWDMA_MASK,
 		.udma_mask	= NV_UDMA_MASK,
 		.port_ops	= &nv_generic_ops,
-		.irq_handler	= nv_generic_interrupt,
+		.private_data	= NV_PI_PRIV(nv_generic_interrupt, &nv_sht),
 	},
 	/* nforce2/3 */
 	{
-		.sht		= &nv_sht,
 		.flags		= ATA_FLAG_SATA | ATA_FLAG_NO_LEGACY,
 		.pio_mask	= NV_PIO_MASK,
 		.mwdma_mask	= NV_MWDMA_MASK,
 		.udma_mask	= NV_UDMA_MASK,
 		.port_ops	= &nv_nf2_ops,
-		.irq_handler	= nv_nf2_interrupt,
+		.private_data	= NV_PI_PRIV(nv_nf2_interrupt, &nv_sht),
 	},
 	/* ck804 */
 	{
-		.sht		= &nv_sht,
 		.flags		= ATA_FLAG_SATA | ATA_FLAG_NO_LEGACY,
 		.pio_mask	= NV_PIO_MASK,
 		.mwdma_mask	= NV_MWDMA_MASK,
 		.udma_mask	= NV_UDMA_MASK,
 		.port_ops	= &nv_ck804_ops,
-		.irq_handler	= nv_ck804_interrupt,
+		.private_data	= NV_PI_PRIV(nv_ck804_interrupt, &nv_sht),
 	},
 	/* ADMA */
 	{
-		.sht		= &nv_adma_sht,
 		.flags		= ATA_FLAG_SATA | ATA_FLAG_NO_LEGACY |
 				  ATA_FLAG_MMIO | ATA_FLAG_NCQ,
 		.pio_mask	= NV_PIO_MASK,
 		.mwdma_mask	= NV_MWDMA_MASK,
 		.udma_mask	= NV_UDMA_MASK,
 		.port_ops	= &nv_adma_ops,
-		.irq_handler	= nv_adma_interrupt,
+		.private_data	= NV_PI_PRIV(nv_adma_interrupt, &nv_adma_sht),
 	},
 	/* SWNCQ */
 	{
-		.sht		= &nv_swncq_sht,
 		.flags	        = ATA_FLAG_SATA | ATA_FLAG_NO_LEGACY |
 				  ATA_FLAG_NCQ,
 		.pio_mask	= NV_PIO_MASK,
 		.mwdma_mask	= NV_MWDMA_MASK,
 		.udma_mask	= NV_UDMA_MASK,
 		.port_ops	= &nv_swncq_ops,
-		.irq_handler	= nv_swncq_interrupt,
+		.private_data	= NV_PI_PRIV(nv_swncq_interrupt, &nv_swncq_sht),
 	},
 };
 
@@ -2316,6 +2319,7 @@ static int nv_init_one(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *ent)
 {
 	static int printed_version;
 	const struct ata_port_info *ppi[] = { NULL, NULL };
+	struct nv_pi_priv *ipriv;
 	struct ata_host *host;
 	struct nv_host_priv *hpriv;
 	int rc;
@@ -2352,6 +2356,7 @@ static int nv_init_one(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *ent)
 	}
 
 	ppi[0] = &nv_port_info[type];
+	ipriv = ppi[0]->private_data;
 	rc = ata_pci_prepare_sff_host(pdev, ppi, &host);
 	if (rc)
 		return rc;
@@ -2390,8 +2395,8 @@ static int nv_init_one(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *ent)
 		nv_swncq_host_init(host);
 
 	pci_set_master(pdev);
-	return ata_host_activate(host, pdev->irq, ppi[0]->irq_handler,
-				 IRQF_SHARED, ppi[0]->sht);
+	return ata_host_activate(host, pdev->irq, ipriv->irq_handler,
+				 IRQF_SHARED, ipriv->sht);
 }
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_PM
diff --git a/include/linux/libata.h b/include/linux/libata.h
index e24b94c..4f61beb 100644
--- a/include/linux/libata.h
+++ b/include/linux/libata.h
@@ -746,14 +746,12 @@ struct ata_port_operations {
 };
 
 struct ata_port_info {
-	struct scsi_host_template	*sht;
 	unsigned long		flags;
 	unsigned long		link_flags;
 	unsigned long		pio_mask;
 	unsigned long		mwdma_mask;
 	unsigned long		udma_mask;
 	struct ata_port_operations *port_ops;
-	irq_handler_t		irq_handler;
 	void 			*private_data;
 };
 
-- 
1.5.2.4


  parent reply	other threads:[~2008-03-11 12:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-03-11 12:05 [PATCHSET] libata: clean up scsi_host_templates and ata_port_operations, take #3 Tejun Heo
2008-03-11 12:05 ` [PATCH 1/9] libata: reorganize ata_port_operations Tejun Heo
2008-03-11 12:05 ` [PATCH 2/9] libata: implement and use ata_noop_irq_clear() Tejun Heo
2008-03-11 12:05 ` [PATCH 3/9] libata: normalize port_info, port_operations and sht tables Tejun Heo
2008-03-11 12:06 ` [PATCH 4/9] libata: implement and use SHT initializers Tejun Heo
2008-03-11 12:06 ` [PATCH 5/9] libata: implement and use ops inheritance Tejun Heo
2008-03-11 12:06 ` [PATCH 6/9] libata: make ata_pci_init_one() not use ops->irq_handler and pi->sht Tejun Heo
2008-03-11 12:06 ` [PATCH 7/9] libata: stop overloading port_info->private_data Tejun Heo
2008-03-11 12:06 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2008-03-11 12:06 ` [PATCH 9/9] libata: make reset related methods proper port operations Tejun Heo
2008-03-11 15:09 ` [PATCHSET] libata: clean up scsi_host_templates and ata_port_operations, take #3 Mark Lord
2008-03-12  6:48 ` Tejun Heo
2008-03-17 12:28 ` Jeff Garzik
2008-03-19  5:43   ` Tejun Heo
2008-03-19  5:45     ` [PATCH] sata_promise: hardreset is broken Tejun Heo
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-01-30  9:28 [PATCHSET libata-dev#upstream] clean up scsi_host_templates and ata_port_operations Tejun Heo
2008-01-30  9:29 ` [PATCH 8/9] libata: kill port_info->sht and ->irq_handler Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=12052371683661-git-send-email-htejun@gmail.com \
    --to=htejun@gmail.com \
    --cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=alessandro.zummo@towertech \
    --cc=jeff@garzik.org \
    --cc=kngregertsen@norway.atmel.com \
    --cc=liml@rtr.ca \
    --cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rmk@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=sonic.adi@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.