From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [194.106.48.114] (helo=tim.rpsys.net ident=0) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1JZYGa-0002xp-Ev for openembedded-devel@openembedded.org; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 22:13:42 +0100 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m2CLBYVY031866 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 21:11:34 GMT Received: from tim.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tim.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 31479-09 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 21:11:30 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [192.168.1.3] (dax.rpnet.com [192.168.1.3]) (authenticated bits=0) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m2CLBSTX031859 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 21:11:28 GMT From: Richard Purdie To: openembedded-devel@openembedded.org In-Reply-To: References: <200803110807.11368.zecke@selfish.org> <200803111126.04715.openembedded@haerwu.biz> <20080311114938.GM30267@ibawizard.net> <20080311145739.GN30267@ibawizard.net> <1205250588.4521.111.camel@dax.rpnet.com> <20080312014945.4783ae6a@widy.localdomain> <1205280598.16531.26.camel@dax.rpnet.com> <20080312024408.44d9192e@widy.localdomain> Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 21:11:30 +0000 Message-Id: <1205356290.4530.7.camel@dax.rpnet.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.1 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rpsys.net X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 194.106.48.114 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: rpurdie@rpsys.net X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3 (2007-08-08) on serenity X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,RDNS_NONE autolearn=no version=3.2.3 X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Tue, 21 Aug 2007 23:39:36 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on linuxtogo.org) Subject: Re: Reconsidering the work flow and how the SCM system fits in X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 21:13:43 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Wed, 2008-03-12 at 20:00 +0100, Koen Kooi wrote: > Actually it shows that hg fits better into the OE way of using a DSCM: > central repo (and mirrors) with distributed developers. > > I keep hearing people saying that they have no clue on how to setup a > git-server for OE where we can commit things as usual, Thats not quite true, we've just wondered what the best way to do it is... > while with hg it's just 'hg serve'. How do two hg servers interact? Cheers, Richard