From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D472EDDEEF for ; Tue, 18 Mar 2008 16:36:12 +1100 (EST) Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: NEWEMAC: Support for Pause packets in EMAC driver From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: Jeff Garzik In-Reply-To: <47DF3FC7.6070500@garzik.org> References: <1205488348-22536-1-git-send-email-sr@denx.de> <47DE5F43.80604@garzik.org> <1205789101.26869.181.camel@pasglop> <1205789205.26869.184.camel@pasglop> <20080317164341.12075616@zod.rchland.ibm.com> <1205790747.26869.187.camel@pasglop> <47DEF159.3020504@garzik.org> <20080317200855.2954971a@zod.rchland.ibm.com> <1205808100.26869.204.camel@pasglop> <47DF3FC7.6070500@garzik.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2008 16:35:33 +1100 Message-Id: <1205818533.26869.214.camel@pasglop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Stefan Roese , linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org Reply-To: benh@kernel.crashing.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, 2008-03-18 at 00:06 -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: > Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > >> http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=120449748701492&w=2 > >> > >> I sent it to Ben with netdev on CC because you asked the various people > >> sending NEWEMAC patches to you to find a single person. > >> > >> So from now on, what are we going to do? It seems we're playing net > >> maintainer russian roulette for NEWEMAC and it's getting old. > > > > I'm happy to collect the patches. I said I would do it, I was just taken > > aback a bit by Jeff suddenly merging two of Stefan patches directly :-) > > Sorry... they were CC'd to me and netdev, Stefan had previously > contributed acceptable patches, and the patches looked OK, so... :) Sure they were fine, it's just a matter of getting the right procedure :-) Now, I'll collect the remaining ones and will send them for review again. Cheers, Ben. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: NEWEMAC: Support for Pause packets in EMAC driver Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2008 16:35:33 +1100 Message-ID: <1205818533.26869.214.camel@pasglop> References: <1205488348-22536-1-git-send-email-sr@denx.de> <47DE5F43.80604@garzik.org> <1205789101.26869.181.camel@pasglop> <1205789205.26869.184.camel@pasglop> <20080317164341.12075616@zod.rchland.ibm.com> <1205790747.26869.187.camel@pasglop> <47DEF159.3020504@garzik.org> <20080317200855.2954971a@zod.rchland.ibm.com> <1205808100.26869.204.camel@pasglop> <47DF3FC7.6070500@garzik.org> Reply-To: benh@kernel.crashing.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Josh Boyer , Stefan Roese , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Valentine Barshak To: Jeff Garzik Return-path: Received: from gate.crashing.org ([63.228.1.57]:55444 "EHLO gate.crashing.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759125AbYCRFgV (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Mar 2008 01:36:21 -0400 In-Reply-To: <47DF3FC7.6070500@garzik.org> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, 2008-03-18 at 00:06 -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: > Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > >> http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=120449748701492&w=2 > >> > >> I sent it to Ben with netdev on CC because you asked the various people > >> sending NEWEMAC patches to you to find a single person. > >> > >> So from now on, what are we going to do? It seems we're playing net > >> maintainer russian roulette for NEWEMAC and it's getting old. > > > > I'm happy to collect the patches. I said I would do it, I was just taken > > aback a bit by Jeff suddenly merging two of Stefan patches directly :-) > > Sorry... they were CC'd to me and netdev, Stefan had previously > contributed acceptable patches, and the patches looked OK, so... :) Sure they were fine, it's just a matter of getting the right procedure :-) Now, I'll collect the remaining ones and will send them for review again. Cheers, Ben.