From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.43) id 1JcMk0-0001AV-9O for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Mar 2008 11:31:40 -0400 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JcMjy-00018L-Dx for grub-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Mar 2008 11:31:38 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JcMjw-00017R-MB for grub-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Mar 2008 11:31:37 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JcMjw-00017H-FG for grub-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Mar 2008 11:31:36 -0400 Received: from c60.cesmail.net ([216.154.195.49]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JcMjw-0005SY-AS for grub-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Mar 2008 11:31:36 -0400 Received: from unknown (HELO relay.cesmail.net) ([192.168.1.81]) by c60.cesmail.net with ESMTP; 20 Mar 2008 11:31:33 -0400 Received: from [192.168.1.21] (static-72-92-88-10.phlapa.fios.verizon.net [72.92.88.10]) by relay.cesmail.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6537619058 for ; Thu, 20 Mar 2008 11:31:33 -0400 (EDT) From: Pavel Roskin To: The development of GRUB 2 In-Reply-To: <20080320131046.GA16344@thorin> References: <20080212005113.nlirwi2ko4gkg80s@webmail.spamcop.net> <20080212113451.GB19144@thorin> <20080320131046.GA16344@thorin> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2008 11:31:33 -0400 Message-Id: <1206027093.31267.21.camel@dv> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.3 (2.12.3-3.fc8) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. Subject: Re: Rename update-grub to grub-update? X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: The development of GRUB 2 List-Id: The development of GRUB 2 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2008 15:31:38 -0000 On Thu, 2008-03-20 at 14:10 +0100, Robert Millan wrote: > On a second thought, this wouldn't be much of an issue if Debian can have its > own "update-grub" which wraps around "grub-mkconfig" or whatever you want to > call it. > > Additionally, this would allow us to change the CLI to something that doesn't > hardcode /boot/grub/grub.cfg and provides greater flexibility, e.g.: > > grub-mkconfig -o /boot/grub/grub.cfg > > which is also useful for Debian. Fine with me. -- Regards, Pavel Roskin