From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
To: Roel Kluin <12o3l@tiscali.nl>
Cc: khc@pm.waw.pl, lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers/net/wan/wanxl.c: time_before(timeout, jiffies) -> jiffies, timeout
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2008 09:46:06 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1206031566.26345.63.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <47E28637.4010700@tiscali.nl>
On Thu, 2008-03-20 at 16:43 +0100, Roel Kluin wrote:
> fix reversal of timeout and jiffies
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wan/wanxl.c b/drivers/net/wan/wanxl.c
> index d4aab8a..f61413b 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wan/wanxl.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wan/wanxl.c
> @@ -650,7 +650,7 @@ static int __devinit wanxl_pci_init_one(struct pci_dev *pdev,
>
> timeout = jiffies + 20 * HZ;
> while ((stat = readl(card->plx + PLX_MAILBOX_0)) != 0) {
> - if (time_before(timeout, jiffies)) {
> + if (time_before(jiffies, timeout)) {
> printk(KERN_WARNING "wanXL %s: timeout waiting for"
> " PUTS to complete\n", pci_name(pdev));
> wanxl_pci_remove_one(pdev);
Wouldn't it be better to have a schedule() in those
while loops too?
Maybe a more generic macro / statement expression
would be more readable?
perhaps something like (compiled/untested):
drivers/net/wan/wanxl.c | 86 ++++++++++++++++------------------------------
1 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 56 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wan/wanxl.c b/drivers/net/wan/wanxl.c
index d4aab8a..db1eabe 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wan/wanxl.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wan/wanxl.c
@@ -51,6 +51,19 @@ static const char* version = "wanXL serial card driver version: 0.48";
#define MBX2_MEMSZ_MASK 0xFFFF0000 /* PUTS Memory Size Register mask */
+#define TEST_UNTIL_TIMEOUT(test, hz) \
+({ \
+ typeof test t; \
+ unsigned long timeout = jiffies + hz; \
+ do { \
+ t = test; \
+ if (t) \
+ break; \
+ schedule(); \
+ } while (time_before(jiffies, timeout)); \
+ t; \
+})
+
typedef struct {
struct net_device *dev;
struct card_t *card;
@@ -396,7 +409,6 @@ static int wanxl_open(struct net_device *dev)
{
port_t *port = dev_to_port(dev);
u8 __iomem *dbr = port->card->plx + PLX_DOORBELL_TO_CARD;
- unsigned long timeout;
int i;
if (get_status(port)->open) {
@@ -412,18 +424,15 @@ static int wanxl_open(struct net_device *dev)
/* signal the card */
writel(1 << (DOORBELL_TO_CARD_OPEN_0 + port->node), dbr);
- timeout = jiffies + HZ;
- do
- if (get_status(port)->open) {
- netif_start_queue(dev);
- return 0;
- }
- while (time_after(timeout, jiffies));
+ if (!TEST_UNTIL_TIMEOUT((get_status(port)->open), HZ)) {
+ printk(KERN_ERR "%s: unable to open port\n", dev->name);
+ /* ask the card to close the port, should it be still alive */
+ writel(1 << (DOORBELL_TO_CARD_CLOSE_0 + port->node), dbr);
+ return -EFAULT;
+ }
- printk(KERN_ERR "%s: unable to open port\n", dev->name);
- /* ask the card to close the port, should it be still alive */
- writel(1 << (DOORBELL_TO_CARD_CLOSE_0 + port->node), dbr);
- return -EFAULT;
+ netif_start_queue(dev);
+ return 0;
}
@@ -431,7 +440,6 @@ static int wanxl_open(struct net_device *dev)
static int wanxl_close(struct net_device *dev)
{
port_t *port = dev_to_port(dev);
- unsigned long timeout;
int i;
hdlc_close(dev);
@@ -439,13 +447,7 @@ static int wanxl_close(struct net_device *dev)
writel(1 << (DOORBELL_TO_CARD_CLOSE_0 + port->node),
port->card->plx + PLX_DOORBELL_TO_CARD);
- timeout = jiffies + HZ;
- do
- if (!get_status(port)->open)
- break;
- while (time_after(timeout, jiffies));
-
- if (get_status(port)->open)
+ if (TEST_UNTIL_TIMEOUT((!get_status(port)->open), HZ))
printk(KERN_ERR "%s: unable to close port\n", dev->name);
netif_stop_queue(dev);
@@ -481,17 +483,11 @@ static struct net_device_stats *wanxl_get_stats(struct net_device *dev)
static int wanxl_puts_command(card_t *card, u32 cmd)
{
- unsigned long timeout = jiffies + 5 * HZ;
-
writel(cmd, card->plx + PLX_MAILBOX_1);
- do {
- if (readl(card->plx + PLX_MAILBOX_1) == 0)
- return 0;
-
- schedule();
- }while (time_after(timeout, jiffies));
+ if (TEST_UNTIL_TIMEOUT((readl(card->plx + PLX_MAILBOX_1)), 5 * HZ))
+ return -1;
- return -1;
+ return 0;
}
@@ -649,27 +645,12 @@ static int __devinit wanxl_pci_init_one(struct pci_dev *pdev,
#endif
timeout = jiffies + 20 * HZ;
- while ((stat = readl(card->plx + PLX_MAILBOX_0)) != 0) {
- if (time_before(timeout, jiffies)) {
- printk(KERN_WARNING "wanXL %s: timeout waiting for"
- " PUTS to complete\n", pci_name(pdev));
- wanxl_pci_remove_one(pdev);
- return -ENODEV;
- }
-
- switch(stat & 0xC0) {
- case 0x00: /* hmm - PUTS completed with non-zero code? */
- case 0x80: /* PUTS still testing the hardware */
- break;
-
- default:
- printk(KERN_WARNING "wanXL %s: PUTS test 0x%X"
+ if (TEST_UNTIL_TIMEOUT(((stat = readl(card->plx + PLX_MAILBOX_0)) != 0),
+ 20 * HZ)) {
+ printk(KERN_WARNING "wanXL %s: PUTS test 0x%X"
" failed\n", pci_name(pdev), stat & 0x30);
wanxl_pci_remove_one(pdev);
return -ENODEV;
- }
-
- schedule();
}
/* get on-board memory size (PUTS detects no more than 4 MB) */
@@ -734,15 +715,8 @@ static int __devinit wanxl_pci_init_one(struct pci_dev *pdev,
return -ENODEV;
}
- stat = 0;
- timeout = jiffies + 5 * HZ;
- do {
- if ((stat = readl(card->plx + PLX_MAILBOX_5)) != 0)
- break;
- schedule();
- }while (time_after(timeout, jiffies));
-
- if (!stat) {
+ if (TEST_UNTIL_TIMEOUT(((stat = readl(card->plx + PLX_MAILBOX_5)) != 0),
+ 5 * HZ)) {
printk(KERN_WARNING "wanXL %s: timeout while initializing card "
"firmware\n", pci_name(pdev));
wanxl_pci_remove_one(pdev);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-03-20 16:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-03-20 15:43 [PATCH] drivers/net/wan/wanxl.c: time_before(timeout, jiffies) -> jiffies, timeout Roel Kluin
2008-03-20 16:46 ` Joe Perches [this message]
2008-03-20 20:23 ` Roel Kluin
2008-03-20 21:06 ` Joe Perches
2008-03-24 15:01 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2008-03-24 15:52 ` Joe Perches
2008-03-24 20:22 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2008-03-24 14:42 ` Krzysztof Halasa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1206031566.26345.63.camel@localhost \
--to=joe@perches.com \
--cc=12o3l@tiscali.nl \
--cc=khc@pm.waw.pl \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.