From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [66.111.4.25] (helo=out1.smtp.messagingengine.com) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1JgX4R-00005K-B5 for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Tue, 01 Apr 2008 05:21:59 +0200 Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.internal [10.202.2.42]) by out1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1A21E42D7 for ; Mon, 31 Mar 2008 23:21:58 -0400 (EDT) Received: from web7.messagingengine.com ([10.202.2.216]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 31 Mar 2008 23:21:58 -0400 Received: by web7.messagingengine.com (Postfix, from userid 99) id 79C5E3894C; Mon, 31 Mar 2008 23:21:58 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <1207020118.3961.1245353213@webmail.messagingengine.com> X-Sasl-Enc: 0QpbrVmwC2we2XknDByySQeJt64+kQFB8Ww7irHDGtVM 1207020118 From: "Hasjim Williams" To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface References: <1204494435.17068.23.camel@utx.utx.cz> <1205992995.25920.1243400709@webmail.messagingengine.com> <1206017175.4700.8.camel@hammer.suse.cz> <1206051256.5975.1243541279@webmail.messagingengine.com> <1206295294.6914.7.camel@utx.utx.cz> <1206495575.1924.1244289243@webmail.messagingengine.com> <1207009644.9370.1245329833@webmail.messagingengine.com> In-Reply-To: <1207009644.9370.1245329833@webmail.messagingengine.com> Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2008 13:21:58 +1000 Subject: Re: iwmmxt optimization on PXA270 (dejagnu test report) X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2008 03:21:59 -0000 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" On Tue, 01 Apr 2008 10:27:24 +1000, "Hasjim Williams" said: > > Joseph S Myers just replied to my post on the gcc mailing list, about > this: > http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A-wot-to-do-with-the-Maverick-Crunch-patches--p16397272.html > > gcc 4.2.2 doesn't have the patch for iwmmxt unwind support applied: > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-01/msg00049.html > > It should be in gcc 4.3.0. We could also go to gcc 4.2.3, as I think the patch is in there. Also, gcc-4.2.4 is supposed to be released soon.